A fleet of drones patrolling New York City’s beaches for signs of sharks and struggling swimmers is drawing backlash from an aggressive group of seaside residents: local shorebirds.

Since the drones began flying in May, flocks of birds have repeatedly swarmed the devices, forcing the police department and other city agencies to adjust their flight plans. While the attacks have slowed, they have not stopped completely, fueling concern from wildlife experts about the impact on threatened species nesting along the coast.

Veronica Welsh, a wildlife coordinator at the Parks Department, said the birds were “very annoyed by the drones” from the moment they arrived on the beach.

  • pageflight@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I wonder what semi-autonomous aircraft have the least impact on birds. Fixed-wing (planes) are much more efficient and, not coincidentally, often a lot quieter. For patrolling and looking for sharks/swimmers, seems like they might work as well or better.

    Also I wonder if drones offer any demonstrated benefit over lifeguards.

    • Soggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Balloons, probably. Like a WWI reconnaissance blimp. With modern optics that thing could survey the entire beach without moving.

  • Obi@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I fly drones for work and seagulls in particular are always checking it out and being all aggressive around it. Fuckers can’t fly upwards nearly as fast as the drone though so it’s easy enough to leave them in the dust. They never actually make contact though but it’s still annoying.

      • Obi@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Just to be clear, while I’m joking around here to make a funny, you’re 100% right and I do everything in my power to be as little intrusive as I can especially in actual natural areas. The birds I’m talking about here are city-rat-style seagulls, they’re not in any danger, in fact if you read the subtext of my original comment, you’ll notice I fly away from them immediately which is the correct thing to do for both them and the drone. Also I’m currently taking steps to move into new niches in my work so I don’t need to fly so often, because while I do love it I recognise it bothers people and wildlife and don’t really want to do it more than I absolutely need to.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Well now you need to make drones to fight off the seagulls. Those things are fucking vile anyway so, have fun lol

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    “the drones could prompt a stress response in some birds that causes them to flee the beach and abandon their eggs”

    Solution is self evident:

    Use the drones to hatch the eggs and raise the chicks. :) Very, very, confused chicks…

  • Agrivar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Fucking drones. I don’t care what they’re being used for, every time one is being flown at the beach I frequent it’s a nuisance.

  • whoreticulture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Y’all are making a joke out of this headline but it really sucks

    But he was quick to raise a far more dire possibility: that the drones could prompt a stress response in some birds that causes them to flee the beach and abandon their eggs, as several thousand elegant terns did following a recent drone crash in San Diego.

    It’s honestly so horrible that this was approved. Drones are banned in National Parks for a reason. Birds have very few beach areas left where they can nest.