• sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    -“If you’re an AI Cop, you have to tell me. It’s the law.”
    -“I’m not a cop.”

  • minorkeys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    If you ask ChatGPT, it says it’s guidelines include not giving the impression it’s a human. But if you ask it be less human because it is confusing you, it says that would break the guidelines.

    • markovs_gun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      ChatGPT doesn’t know its own guidelines because those aren’t even included in its training corpus. Never trust an LLM about how it works or how it “thinks” because fundamentally these answers are fake.

  • Donkter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Yeah for real, what does this mean exactly? All forms of machine learning? That’s a lot of computers at this moment, it’s just we only colloquially call the chat bot versions “AI”. But even that gets vague do reactive video game NPCs get counted as “AI?” Or all of our search algorithms and spell check programs?

    At that point what’s the point? The disclosure would become as meaningless as websites asking for cookies or the number of things known to cause cancer in the state of California.

  • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    But Peter Thiel said regulating AI will bring the biblical apocalypse. ƪ(˘⌣˘)ʃ

  • ssillyssadass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Weird how California keeps being the most progressive state in the US.

    It’s like being the best smelling turd in a toilet, but at least it’s something.

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Will someone please tell California that “AI” doesn’t exist?

    This is how politicians promote a grift by pretending to regulate it.

    Worthless politicians making worthless laws.

  • cactusfacecomics@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Seems reasonable to me. If you’re using AI then you should be required to own up to it. If you’re too embarrassed to own up to it, then maybe you shouldn’t be using it.

      • eldebryn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        IMO if your “A*” style algorithm is used for chatbot or any kind of user interaction or content generation, it should still be explicitly declared.

        That being said, there is some nuance here about A) use of Copyrighted material and B) Non-deterministic behaviour. Neither of which is (usually) a concern in more classical non-DL approaches to AI solutions.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’m stoked to see the legal definition of “AI”. I’m sure the lawyers and costumed clowns will really clear it all up.

      • MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Prosecution: “Your Honor, the definition of artificial is ‘made or produced by human beings rather than occurring naturally,’ and as all human beings are themselves produced by human beings, we are definitionally artificial. Therefore, the actions of an intelligent human are inherently AI.”

        Defense: “The defense does not argue this point, as such. However, our client, FOX News, could not be said to be exhibiting ‘intelligence.’ Artificial they may be, but AI they are clearly not. We rest our case.”

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      USA is run by capitalist grifters. There is no objective meaning under this regime. It’s all just misleading buzzwords and propaganda.

    • shane@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      I mean, we call the software that runs computer players in games AI, so… ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

      • Hungry_man@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        The AI chatbot brainrot is way worse tbh.someone legit said to me why don’t chatgpt cure cancer like wtf

        • Leon@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          As if taking all of 4-chan, scrambling it around a little, and pouring the contents out would lead to a cure for cancer. lmao

  • madjo@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    bleep bloop… I am a real human being who loves doing human being stuff like breathing and existing

    • 🔍🦘🛎@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Hi there, Cancer Robot here! Excellent question iopq! We state that we cause cancer first, as is tradition.