• 🖖USS-Ethernet@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Never going to happen, but good on her for at least trying. I’m not up to speed on Alito, but from what I heard about Thomas, those were most definitely bribes. Idk how anyone could consider it anything else.

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Alito is the guy who flew MAGA-adjacent flags at his home and his summer home and blamed both on his wife

    • 2484345508@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m for the top cap, but I do want someone just a bit older on the Supreme Court. 35 is the age for presidency. I’m good with 35-65 with an 8 year maximum term.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        You can definitely remain a successful intellectual later in life. Staying on top of the fast moving stuff is probably harder when you’re older.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s a public repudiation in a way that is extraordinarily rare and highly symbolic. Nothing may change but shots have been fired across bows.

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Fucking seriously…

          “We’re” stuck in the same stupid fucking mindset the founding morons were where they relied on shame and integrity when designing our government…

          We’re dealing with a party that only believes “might makes right” and we’re wagging our fingers at them as if they give a shit at all…

          • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            How they haven’t learned this lesson after 10 years of “OMG can you believe Trump did XXXXXX!” posts every single day I will never understand.

      • Verito@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        We’re well past it meaning anything. These rebukes, reprimands, and censures are political theater. Fascists laugh when you use the rigged system against them.

  • barkingspiders@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Fantastic, I know this probably won’t go anywhere but this is the right thing to do regardless. SCOTUS needs to be held accountable to the American people for their actions. We grant them extraordinary power and that must come with extraordinary accountability. Holding them to a lower standard than any judge in a lesser court is ridiculous. The higher the court, the higher the standards should be.

    • Kerred@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I am still hoping for the day to see someone of the same party convict a politician.

      If anyone has any cases I’d love a link!

      • solrize@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Nixon resigned a day(?) after the impeachment articles were filed, because House Republicans told him that he didn’t have enough support in the party to not get convicted.

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          If a judge is a politician

          The fact that is a thought that is reasonable to be expressed is part of the problem. Judges (and the justice system in general) should not be political in the slightest.

  • Neato@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Fuck yeah. Probably won’t go anywhere with a traitorous house majority but it’s worth it to try and get them on the record.

      • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The term corruption doesn’t even begin to cover it. The man is a paid actor. A rubber stamp for republican party political positions.

        • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          He needs to do a one-on-one interview where he explains himself. The American people are demanding it.

        • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Check out the excellent podcast “Behind the Bastards”’s episodes on Clarence if you haven’t already. They’re amazing. (And horrifying)

  • tisktisk@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Wasn’t trump impeached twice? What does this even mean concretely?
    Not knocking the sentiment, just questioning the practicality

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Gives Dem voters something to rally around in the lead up to the election…

      Like. This is literally the time and place for performative actions, but I swear it’s like everyone’s forgot what the word “campaign” means.

    • Burstar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Unfortunately it means as much as it did for the Trump impeachments. There is zero chance any, let alone enough, Republicans would vote to convict these conservative judges regardless of the evidence and validity of the charge(s).

    • finley@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Put simply, an impeachment happens in the House of Representatives and is akin to an indictment by Grand Jury. If successful, the proceeding then moves to the Senate for trial, where the party is either convicted or acquitted. A conviction would mean removal from office and the possibility of facing criminal charges.

      Trump was impeached twice, but he was not convicted either time.

      • balderdash@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Also good to note that the Constitution doesn’t mandate the Senate convict the president under any circumstance other than treason.

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Without getting too technical, and someone please correct anything that may be represented incorrectly: It’s basically like a trial. The House is the plaintiff, prosecutor, and jury and the Senate is the judge.

      The House gathers / presents evidence and tries them then renders a verdict (Impeachment)

      The Senate is responsible for sentencing or acquitting.

      In both of Trump’s, the House found him guilty of the charges but the Republican controlled Senate acquitted him.

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Impeachment is the decision to press charges, and the Senate trial is closer to the actual trial.

        “Charged and convicted” -> “impeached and convicted”

        Otherwise a perfectly good analogy. :)

        The distinction only matters for people who bring up due process concerns. The impeachment proceedings aren’t actually a trial, but a decision to have one, as such you aren’t obligated to the same ability to speak in your own defense as you would be at a proper trial. With the Senate trial there’s more expectation of due process because it’s an actual trial.

    • S_204@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It means nothing. It’s political theatre to distract from the party’s current issues.

  • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I doubt this will go very far with the red controlled house. But I’m happy to have something new to occupy the news cycle other than bucking about switching candidates.

  • Asherah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m voting for Biden. Not happily, not even simply neutral on the matter. I hate that I have to vote for Biden.

    If AOC ran, I would not be even a little reluctant to vote for her. She reminds me of Bernie.

    • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Biden is close to senile, and I’m assuming he’ll pass away within the next 4 years. Honestly, I hope he’ll win the elections and then peacefully passes away. Nothing against him personally, he seems like a nice guy but what the US (and by extension, the world, thanks for that) needs is not a narcissistic psychopath, and also not a senile grandfather for president.

      • noevidenz@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        AOC is currently 34 and her birthday is in October, so she will actually be old enough to be president by the time of the election.

        • finestnothing@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah, but you know people will throw out misinformation saying she can’t actually become president because she’s 34 and some people will believe them and stick with Biden or someone else who we know for damn sure is over 35 and it’ll just split the vote unless Biden (and any other big names on the left) drop out

    • Zerlyna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m voting for the Biden administration. It’s more than just him. We need them all.

      • cmbabul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m voting the same way but more because we need to not have the other administration, we need much more that the current admin but we also do not have the luxury of being picky

    • lengau@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is her first election where she’s eligible to run for president. I wouldn’t be surprised to see her run in 2028