• rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    If he’d done that he would have been lame duck on day 1. The second he says he’s not running anymore is the complete end of his ability to have any real legislative influence.

      • rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Sorry I don’t understand what you mean, are you saying he did indicate that? When? If not, I’m following your hypothetical out. If a president announces he’s leaving (or otherwise is transitioning power to another administration) they’ve basically ceded the remainder of their administrative power.

        • Deceptichum@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Multiple times before he was elected.

          Those were direct quotes from him I used above.

          • Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Like most things Biden, the truth is complicated and not on his side. His camp made many allusions to being one term in 2020, and he made various comments suggesting that news reports of one term had veracity. Now in the same fashion the establishment says he won the primary as the choice of the people (while they blocked supporting anyone else, look up the results where uncommitted aka not Biden ranked higher than his “opponents”), his defenders say he never explicitly said it as a definite so it can’t be criticized, and the myriad of News Articles saying one term from 2020 shouldn’t have been trusted.