Lawyers for Donald Trump’s former faith advisor Robert Morris accused a 12-year-old girl of initiating “inappropriate” sexual conduct with the ex-Dallas megachurch  pastor, new documents have revealed.

Morris resigned in June after admitting to the incident. His accuser Cindy Clemishire previously claimed that the pastor had begun abusing her on Christmas Day in 1982.

Clemishire, now 52, said that Morris and his wife had been staying at her family home at the time when he asked her to come into his room, whereafter he told her to lay on his bed and then began touching her inappropriately.

She said the abuse had continued until 1987 when she told her parents.

However, 25 years after the incident, a lawyer for Morris – J Shelby Sharpe – claimed that it was the child who was actually to blame.

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Even if she did, so what? A 12-year-old cannot consent. The adult cannot engage. This is not a defense.

    • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The fact that this post has a downvote is legitimately worrying to me. I really hope that’s not someone who disagrees with this statement.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        We can see who did but that being said, I’ve downvoted posts many times before by accident. It’s very easy to do when scrolling, it was most likely an accident.

          • stoly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            libertarianism is also where I went. There are some people who think contrary to whatever appears in front of them, however.

          • barsquid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            MAGAs’ core principles are bigotry and oppositional defiant disorder. They have a mental disorder compelling them to make the out-groups angry. So of course they spread to places where people hate them, including Lemmy.

          • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            lemm.ee has a conservative community that’s full of some of the most dense individuals I’ve seen on here. It’s quite fun watching them twist themselves into knots when faced with dissenting opinions over there.

      • cygnus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Whoever downvoted has definitely used the word “ephebophilia” unironically int he past.

    • APassenger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Hav me you read the Bible?

      Within some circles, it’s a little bit of one. Just not one that works legally or with you or me.

    • dexa_scantron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The right thing to do if a 12-year-old makes sexual advances on an adult is for the adult to report it because the 12-year-old is probably being abused!! Not to have sex with them!! What the fuck?! (Not that I believe this shit for a second but even if it were true that makes him just as much of an abuser.)

      • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        the 12-year-old is probably being abused!!

        Eh. I dunno. I was engaging in explicitly sexual activities with other children my own age when I was 7, and I wasn’t being abused. To the best of my knowledge, they weren’t either. Sexuality is pretty well baked into our DNA, and sexual exploration, sex play, and yes, sexual intercourse is something children tend to do because it’s so biologically coded into us.

        On the other hand, parents should probably have a frank, shame-free discussion with children about what is, and is not, appropriate behavior with adults, how consent works with peers, and discuss time and space constraints on behaviors.

          • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            The point was that sexual behavior in young children does not necessarily equal abuse.

            • otp@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              The implication was that sexual behaviourtowards adults in young children is the warning sign.

              • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                Children having sexual urges towards and crushes on adults is pretty normal–particularly once they hit early pubescence and are flooded with hormones–so I don’t necessarily see it as a sign that a child has already been abused. But, again, an adult acting sexual towards any child is absolutely, 1000% wrong.

                The perspective I’m coming at this from is that, based on feedback I’ve gotten over the years, I was sexually precocious, and my parents responded by, first, shaming, and second, taking me to a professional because they were sure something was “wrong” with me, and that it needed to be “fixed”. That ended up being deeply harmful to me, and it’s taken me decades to reach some kind of detente with who I am. (The psychologist was actually quite supportive of me. He said my parents were wrong, and that I was going through normal things, albeit at an earlier age than most. But that didn’t really help with the load of shaming that I was getting from my parents and religious leaders.) Parents freaking out and immediately going to an authority is going to have that kind of effect on a child. IMO, it would likely be better for parents to have a very frank, but non-judgmental discussion with a child before leaping to the conclusion that they were acting out because they were abused, rather than because they had a colossal lapse in judgment.