Third Avenue Bridge, which connects New York’s the Bronx to Manhattan, got stuck in an open position due to the high heat on Monday.

FDNY officers arrived in boats and fired water at the structure to try and cool down the metal, which expanded after high temperatures in the city, officials say.

The incident caused major traffic delays during one of the hottest days of the year in New York but reopened on the same day.

    • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Probably because the metal absorbed heat from sunlight and heated up considerably, but the water was room temp only.

    • Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s a good question. Steel is very good at absorbing and retaining heat. Water on the other hand isn’t. Metals in general have way better thermal conductivity than water.

      Exposed to the sun at the same time, a piece of metal will warm up a few times faster than the water. I believe steels can be somewhere around 8-10 times less energy required than to heat a similar mass of water.

      The water could even start out slightly warmer than the bridge. Evaporative cooling would also work here since there is plenty of ventilation around the bridge. But that can slow down based upon humidity level.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Because metals have way better thermal conductivity, they aren’t good at retaining heat.

        Heating equal masses of steel and water the same amount takes exactly the same energy, it just might take longer for the insulator vs. the conductor.

        • Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Specific heat of liquid water is around 4. Steel is like .45-.50 or around there. So it would take 450-500 joules to increase 1kg of steel 1C. Would take around 4k joules to increase 1kg of water by 1C.

          • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Isn’t your wording on the previous post a bit wrong? Metal isn’t good at retaining heat, quite the opposite but it is a lot easier to heat it up in terms on temperature causing the issue in question. The issue isn’t that it is retaining heat but the temperature raising quicker as environment gets hotter.

    • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Probably both. Definitely evaporation will remove the most heat if both substances are at the same temperature initially.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Both. Even the river water below the surface will be cooler than steel that’s been sitting in the sun. And putting that cool water on the bridge absorbs some of the heat and is removed in evaporation, just like sweating.

      • madnificent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Water also needs a substantial amount of energy to evaporate, hence it will sip some heat from the environment around it when it evaporates. Combined with the good thermal conductivity of steel, the bridge cools off.

        You get a similar effect when walking out of a hot shower. The hot water evaporates and cools you down.