jeffw@lemmy.worldM to News@lemmy.world · 9 months agoTrump-loving gays say their MAGA support is ruining their liveswww.lgbtqnation.comexternal-linkmessage-square278fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkTrump-loving gays say their MAGA support is ruining their liveswww.lgbtqnation.comjeffw@lemmy.worldM to News@lemmy.world · 9 months agomessage-square278fedilink
minus-squareNoble Shift@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·9 months agoHistory has proven there is only one way to stop fascists, and it isn’t through tolerance, it’s through overwhelming violence. These aren’t the kind of people you ‘win over’, these are the people you stop. Tolerance is for children who annoy you in a plane, not fascists.
minus-squareJohn Richard@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·9 months agoSo do you have a link or somewhere I can learn more about your domestic terrorist organization?
minus-squareJohn Richard@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·9 months agoSo you keep this information stored on your local computer? Isn’t it dangerous?
minus-squareLog in | Sign up@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·9 months agoThe rest of the conversation is missing, but you seem to be looking for volunteers to be jerked off by you?
minus-squareJohn Richard@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·9 months agoNo the person that removed their comments advocating for violent activities said I should find someone else to jerk off.
minus-squareLog in | Sign up@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·9 months agoYou were jerking them off for advocating violence? That is one weird kink you’ve got there.
minus-squarememfree@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·9 months agoReminds me of a piece that is gone – but the below rephrase comes from here: https://mstdn.social/@ZhiZhu/109502665651546617 "The Paradox of Tolerance disappears if you look at tolerance, not as a moral standard, but as a social contract. If someone does not abide by the contract, then they are not covered by it. In other words: The intolerant are not following the rules of the social contract of mutual tolerance. Since they have broken the terms of the contract, they are no longer covered by the contract, and their intolerance should NOT be tolerated."
minus-squareLog in | Sign up@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·9 months agoI like that. That’s a helpfully consistent way of framing it.
History has proven there is only one way to stop fascists, and it isn’t through tolerance, it’s through overwhelming violence.
These aren’t the kind of people you ‘win over’, these are the people you stop.
Tolerance is for children who annoy you in a plane, not fascists.
So do you have a link or somewhere I can learn more about your domestic terrorist organization?
Absolutely, http://localhost
So you keep this information stored on your local computer? Isn’t it dangerous?
Go jerk off someone else dude.
Who am I jerking off here?
The rest of the conversation is missing, but you seem to be looking for volunteers to be jerked off by you?
No the person that removed their comments advocating for violent activities said I should find someone else to jerk off.
You were jerking them off for advocating violence? That is one weird kink you’ve got there.
Reminds me of a piece that is gone – but the below rephrase comes from here: https://mstdn.social/@ZhiZhu/109502665651546617
"The Paradox of Tolerance disappears if you look at tolerance, not as a moral standard, but as a social contract.
If someone does not abide by the contract, then they are not covered by it.
In other words: The intolerant are not following the rules of the social contract of mutual tolerance.
Since they have broken the terms of the contract, they are no longer covered by the contract, and their intolerance should NOT be tolerated."
I like that. That’s a helpfully consistent way of framing it.