It is hard to imagine that there was not someone inside of Nike that lost their faith in humanity when the pitch for these things was originally taking off.

  • SeaJ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Losing the app means that people can’t change the color of the light on the shoe. You can still do all the other shit manually.

    That said, I feel like companies should be required to open source shit like this once they drop support for it. Otherwise stuff like this adds to the mountains of e-waste poisoning the planet.

    • Ledivin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      …are you under the impression that high-end running shoes are a scam, or something?

    • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Damn, people need to grow up.

      They just move onto hyper-expensive cars, watches, Warhammer figurines, purses, jewelry, etc. The human instinct to flaunt and/or collect is pretty strong in certain people.

    • eyeon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      If anything the gap is bigger than ever as the top end shoes are basically performance enhancers like the nike airflys used to set most records…and their new vaporflys being banned in the Olympics.

      I guess it’s better than hyper expensive shoes just being a paying for a brand thing?

      • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        In the end you can start making a shoe that almost functions like a prosthetic. We are not animals designed to always be running, but with a few tweaks you can make that closer to be true.

      • xthexder@l.sw0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I thought the shoe market had nothing to do with actual usefulness, just how rare they are. It’s not like most of the people buying these expensive shoes actually wear them.

          • xthexder@l.sw0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            I wasn’t aware there was a difference. What classifies a shoe as a runner vs a sneaker? It seems like there’s a ton of overlap to me

            • Cheesus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Running shoes will focus on function with support, breathability, moisture wicking, and breathability. They aren’t necessarily the most comfy shoes to walk in because your gait is different walking vs running. The front of the shoe will have more cushion to help support you pushing off in your running stride.

              Sneakers are meant to be more stylish everyday shoe. They focus more on form over function.

              You’re right there can be overlap. Adidas ultra boosts are stylish enough to be worn every day and are technically a running shoe. Not a lot of runners use them but they do offer the function of a running shoe.

              • xthexder@l.sw0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                Interesting to know. I’ve been buying running shoes and wearing them everyday. I don’t even run or jog really. I guess I could be buying sneakers and they might end up more comfortable? At the rate I wear through shoes though, my current ones will probably last another 5 years.

                • Ledivin@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  A good sneaker will virtually always be way more comfortable than a good running shoe. To risk going with an extreme analogy, it’s like trying to hammer a nail with a sledgehammer - it will get the job done, sure, but it’s absolutely not made for that.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      That is so very not the problem here. Everyone has things they enjoy that other people think are frivolous.

    • magic_lobster_party@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      The problem is that there are usually no other alternatives, or at least not any easily accessible. Heck, these days even routers require app activation for no reason other than to be shitty.

      There should be a law against this. All hardware requiring an app should also have an open API.

      • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Heck, these days even routers require app activation for no reason other than to be shitty

        There are more often than not alternatives that exist that don’t have this requirement.

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        There isn’t one app to post to Lemmy, there’s a dozen. And they’re open source mostly. And there’s a web page. And you can self-host a fediverse node. And ActivityPub is an open standard. And and and.

        Now if this was Reddit, you might be closer to the mark.

      • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        How did you post this comment? // Were you using an app?

        Please refer to the context when interpreting what others say dammit. Your questions stink “ackshyually lol lmao” from a distance.

        The OP is talking about sneakers unnecessarily requiring an “app”; in this context, Farts’ “anything” should be interpreted as “physical goods” (like sneakers), not “internet services that may be accessed through a browser or specialised software” (like Lemmy).

        • BangCrash@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’m sorry oh mighty one.

          I’ll go and enjoy the pun over here while you try to figure out if what I wrote was intentionally funny or accidentally funny, or funny at all. Social ques are hard aren’t they.

          • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Cut off the crap.

            “Ackshyually I was totally joking! Yeah, it was a joke! You’re just too stupid to get the clue” doesn’t work if there’s no clue that it’s a joke on first place, no matter if you rephrase it with Reddit style passive aggressiveness.

            Please do everyone in Lemmy a favour and stay in Reddit. You’ll be in more suitable company.

          • slaacaa@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            You might have intended it to be funny, but it wasn’t, as it is clear from the downvotes. So instead of trying to convince everybody in multiple desperate comments that they are wrong, maybe just move on.

            • BangCrash@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Ya a little late to the game buddy. Convo is a day old at this point.

              But thanks for trying

  • sudo42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    “I’ve got to leave early.”
    “Why? We’re having fun!”
    “Sorry, I got to go home and charge my shoes.”

    We surely live in the future! /s

  • woelkchen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Isn’t the point of self-lacing shoes that they shouldn’t require manual user input at all? What is the app for then?

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      It could have a button.

      But a button wouldnt give them all the permissions on your phone to harvest your data for sale and exploitation.

        • aesthelete@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I just bought a breathalyzer so I can know my BAC when out having a couple at happy hour and be safe to drive home. It works standalone because it has a button and screen, but all over the place it’s like “it has an app!!! It can connect to your phone!!!” who the fuck would ever want to do that?

    • erwan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Because once their app is installed on your phone, they can send you push notification ads for their next great shoes.

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Remember folks: Any smart device you have that requires an internet connection or app is e-waste waiting to happen at the company’s whim.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I mean, there are some devices that fundamentally have to be online to be useful. You’re not losing anything there.

      A Roku stick requires the Roku streaming service to be functioning to be useful. If there wasn’t a service with streaming media, the stick would have nothing to stream.

      The problem is when you have a device that doesn’t have that fundamental requirement but is then unnecessarily tied to an online service. Home automation requiring Internet connectivity, for example, when virtually no home automation actually requires access to any online services, or converting non-live-service video games to live-service video games.

      • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        A Roku stick requires the Roku streaming service to be functioning to be useful. If there wasn’t a service with streaming media, the stick would have nothing to stream.

        Still becomes e-waste if Roku drops support for it. Granted, that’s not the best example as I’ve got an old-ass Roku that still works, but the point stands. Same goes for Fire sticks and other devices like that.

        They really should be forced to, at minimum, release unlocking tools to allow 3rd party firmware. (Think flashing OpenWRT to a Roku and using it as a travel router or something). Ideally, they’d also release a development kit to foster “after-life” uses of such devices.

        Lots of companies will accept old devices back (supposedly to recycle), but there’s another “R”, re-use, that’s also an important part of the process.

      • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        A Roku stick requires the Roku streaming service to be functioning to be useful. If there wasn’t a service with streaming media, the stick would have nothing to stream.

        In cases like this; it’s still only artificially dependant on Rokus services.

        The hardware is perfectly capable of streaming from any number of services, including entirely self-hosted solutions like Emby/Jellyfin/Plex; yet the device can be remotely bricked just by nolonger providing Rokus services to it.

      • AnActOfCreation@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        A Roku stick requires the Roku streaming service to be functioning to be useful.

        That’s not true at all. You could use a Roku with only Plex/Jellyfin and it would be immensely useful.

      • fan0m@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I own a pair. You do lose some functionality without the app. The ability to change the light colors, set and recall presets.

        You can still tighten them without the app. And I think you can set one preset as well (not sure tbh)

        They announced the sunsetting of the app like 2 months ago but the media is capitalizing on the announcement now for some reason. It sucks but it’s not the end of the world not having the app.

      • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Without the app, wearers are unable to change the color of the sneaker’s LED lights. The lights will either maintain the last color scheme selected via the app or, per Nike, “if you didn’t install the app, light will be the default color.” While owners will still be able to use on-shoe buttons to turn the shoes on or off, check its battery, adjust the lace’s tightness, and save fit settings, the ability to change lighting and control the shoes via mobile phone were big selling points of the $350 kicks.

        • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yeah I be pissed if this was done to me. Someone should find a way to access the changing of the lights without the app.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Not like the apk won’t still be obtainable. I still have a pandora apk from around 2012 I use (ad free, cost free) that still works just fine.

      The apk will likely outlast the shoes. Ever since all the shoe companies started using polyurethane soles, hydrolysis eventually just disintegrates them, even if you almost never wear them. After about 10 years they’re usually not wearable any longer.

      • AProfessional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Just by chance because Pandora is very conservative about API changes and it happens to use Android APIs still supported.

  • Default_Defect@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Of all the overpriced bullshit people flock to for no reason other than to be suckers, sneakers are the one that made the least sense to me.

    • BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I talked to a bunch of sneaker heads over the years and i don’t think i’ll ever get it. I don’t like to shit on someone’s hobby, but buying shitty super overpriced sneakers made by slaves is a weird ass hobby.

      • Nythos@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Especially considering most of the time they likely won’t even wear the things because of either how much they cost or because they find them to be a collectors item.

  • Abnorc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    We need self tightening AI nuts and bolts. We could sell them to Boeing or something idk.

  • rsuri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Finally, they fixed shoe-tying. Now all I gotta do when I wanna tie my shoes is download an app and make sure my shoes are charged.

  • jdeath@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    what happens if you are wearing these when the app gets shut off? 0.o