The above image is all us folk in the UK see when you do, and if we try to use a VPN + incognito, we get this:

403 means forbidden, so the message is disingenuous.

They must have put some effort into block lists for VPN servers. Even if it works for some of us, it’s not worth it.

For more information on this, see this article: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4gzxv5gy3qo

  • The Velour Fog @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Imgur has been shitty for years at this point. They kept fucking with the UI when all I wanted to do was upload images and share the link. They should have stayed in their lane, not try to reinvent their platform as social media. Then their wholesale blocking of VPN traffic? Tired of that nonsense. I use imgbb now.

    • vateso5074@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      I will say I don’t like the direction imgur went, but to play devil’s advocate, I don’t think there was any way around it.

      The problem is that being an image host used by millions of users is incredibly expensive, and between needing to pay for the infrastructure, content moderators, and (in this case) regulatory compliance, it all adds up.

      The only income model they have is ads, which is why they needed to re-tool the UI to hinder users’ ability to direct share images, and converting it to a more social media type of format keeps users on the site so they can cycle in more ads for more revenue.

      An ideal internet would not need to rely on ad money to work, but I’m struggling to think of what else could be done at the scale imgur operates, as donation models can barely even keep Lemmy instances above water. If ad money wasn’t a thing, would sites like imgur be able to exist? Maybe they shouldn’t, I don’t know.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Always wondered how Imgur stayed afloat in the first place. As to people whining about ads, yeah I block everything I can, but I’m not about to bitch about Imgur providing me a free service and sending ads.

        Like you, I don’t see a way around it. Sites like Imgur have to be provided by private enterprise, and that requires funding. Can’t see how a subscription model works, people simply wouldn’t pay.

        God forbid the government fund any of it. Look how the Brit and American politicians are fucking up sites that aren’t even government! And don’t start me on what American government sites are deleting and displaying.

        • The_Decryptor@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          There’s 2 ways to make money off sites like Imgur, charge for subscriptions with extra features, or boast about your user numbers and views and get bought by a company that wants to sell ad space.

          Imgur did both.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      And it’s not just known IPs from commercial providers. I rolled my own OpenVPN server on a Digital Ocean droplet. BLOCKED.

      They kicked me to the new layout which I abhor, rather not use the site at all. Took me 10-minutes to find the non-obvious place they hid the option to roll it back.

    • SuluBeddu@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Tbf to them it’s not their fault that the once leftwing party “randomly” decided to put a boneless liberal right before an election that had them winning for sure

      I wonder what lobbies and their media have to say about that magic trick

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      The alternatives who are most likely to take power:

      Farage who will abduct and deport my wife.

      The Tories who can see Farage being popular with bigots and aiming to be even more cunty.

        • essell@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          You got Better option?

          I love the Greens and their current direction, but they’re at the point where they’re saying unworkable things to get left wing support, knowing they’ll never have to follow through because they won’t win enough power.

          • jenesaisquoi@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 days ago

            I’m not familiar with UK parties to be honest, outside of Labour, the two make-rich-people-richer parties and the insanity party I don’t even know which parties there are. If I were British I’d vote for the leftmost and most environmentally friendly party I could find. If that is the Greens then that sounds good to me

              • jenesaisquoi@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                10 days ago

                That’s probably keeping many likeminded people from voting for them. A result of the deeply unfair FPTP voting system. In my country we long ago had a similar system, it resulted in a single party state, until it was reformed to a proportional system.

                • essell@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  10 days ago

                  That would definitely increase both voting and representation for the Greens, yes.

                  Tactical voting is a big thing in the UK to mitigate some of the imbalance of the FPTP system, along with informal electoral pacts between parties.

          • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            There’s always direct action.

            Which is the only way anyone ever won anything for the left anyway.

            Inclusive of but not necessarily violence. But also apparently painting stuff or saying that’s bad is terrorism, so, I mean, why not?

    • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Yeah. Uh. That’s like 25% less helpful for them than it is for the Americans, even if the situation isn’t quite as apocalyptic. They’ll need to actually do stuff.

    • Armand1@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      I put it on here because it’s one of the communities that posts the most photos and I’ve seen a few Imgur embeds posted here in the last day or two. Feel free to forward to any other channel.

      As for it working for you, yeah I suspect they have some IP ban lists, and it definitely won’t cover every VPN, but I don’t think it’s reasonable to ask someone to use a different VPN to see your post. Not that you were necessarily implying that.

      • remon@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        I just don’t see why we should boycott imgur because of something the UK government did to them.

        • Anomnomnomaly@lemmy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          You’re not being asked to, the UK govt hasn’t done anything to them… they did this to themselves by failing to do anything about age verification long before the online safety act came in recently. This is about their failings over the prior years to do basic age checks that have been common on the internet for decades now… going dark in the UK doesn’t affect the ongoing investigations or the fines that will be imposed… they’re basically throwing their toys out of the pram and shouting LALALALALALALALA we can’t hear you anymore.

          Imgur had gone to dogshit anyway, it’s no real loss and the new owners keep making it worse and after the last round of protests from users, went on a mass banning and censorship campaign to further alienate and anger the users they desperately need to shove an ever increasing amount of ads too.

          Blame the right people… the greedy, ignorant techbros who want to extract every ounce of ad revenue they can to line their own pockets at the expense of killing the product they bought.

          • remon@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            they did this to themselves by failing to do anything about age verification long before the online safety act came in recently

            Good. They shouldn’t. Online age verification is an authoritarian scam.

            • Anomnomnomaly@lemmy.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 days ago

              You’ve failed to understand the problem entirely… the entire internet asks users to confirm they are above a certain age when creating accounts… and that happened because the USA demanded it. There’s nothing authoritarian about it… it’s a simple ‘Are you over 13yrs of age’ and you tick yes… that was it.

              • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 days ago

                No, the entire internet absolutely does not ask that. Perhaps you meant the commercial for-profit internet?

            • FishFace@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 days ago

              What they are being fined for (potentially) is not asking for users’ age during account creation. Not whatever you think (in spite of op being clear)

        • Armand1@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          I’m not calling us to not use it as a boycott measure. It’s more of a practical consideration for other users like myself who won’t get to see your posts at all.

          There are alternative approaches that don’t cause these problems so I’d like people to use them.

  • abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Fucking hell. As someone in the UK who used Imgur, this sucks. Like fuck sake, I’m being fucked by the OSA and the reaction to the OSA.

    • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      I do, that’s the only one I can remember which I can embed easily here.

      What are the alternatives? I wish I could just upload images for comments in PieFed.

      • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Catbox is basically what Imgur used to be before it went to absolute shit. You upload images, you can link to them. That’s it. You don’t need to create an account, but if you do, you can see everything you’ve uploaded. It’s free. Not really sure what more you can ask for in an image host.

      • Armand1@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        I just upload directly to the instance, at least that’s what I think I’m doing. My app lets me do that (Boost).

        • hereiamagain@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          I’m on boost too. Let’s find out, here’s a picture uploaded using the built in function.

          Well I’ll be darned, I thought it was using imgur, but I guess it’s straight to the instance. Neat.

          • gigachad@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 days ago

            Interesting, I am using the voyager mobile app. Does that mean the functionality is there but the PieFed frontend hasn’t integrated it?

            • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 days ago

              That is interesting, I just checked and your image is indeed hosted by PieFed itself and not by any external service like I assumed that the 3rd party apps would implement as a workaround.

      • REDACTED@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        I’m using Boost for Lemmy and I never questioned how it works, but I can just add images here straight from my gallery.

          • REDACTED@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            It doesn’t matter, it’s a clone with same functionality. There are users below uploading the same way I did and it uploads on their instance (piefed).

            Realistically it’s just your front end lacking image upload function, but there is back-end for it.

      • Axolotl_cpp@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Changing DNS should solve it since Italian ISPs block things only on a DNS level, i had the same problem for fitgirl and changing DNS solved it

  • Zomg@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Yeah I’ve had this issue when using Mullvad. Definitely a VPN specific issue.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      My VPN is custom and they block me. How can they tell the traffic is being routed via VPN? I should know this, can’t quite remember how that works.

  • ᓚᘏᗢ@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Why? I don’t post stuff so I don’t really care either way, but free vpns are so easy to find and use and the paid options aren’t that expensive either.

    • Anomnomnomaly@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      Let’s give this classic poem a tweak shall we…

      First they came for the Communists And I did not speak out Because I was not a Communist

      Then they came for the Socialists And I did not speak out Because I was not a Socialist

      Then they came for the trans community (The UK is currently here) And I did not speak out Because I was not trans

      Then they came for all people of colour (The USA is now here) And I did not speak out Because I was not a person of colour

      Then they came for me And there was no one left To speak out for me

      Not caring because it doesn’t directly affect you is how you end up on this road to fascism to begin with. It’s why there have been thousands of arrests of innocent people in the UK for simply protesting about a ban on a group of people who threw paint on some RAF planes and vandalised some genocide supporting israeli weapons manufacturer… because some people do care about others, because they have compassion and a conscience.

      If the UK goes ahead with plans to ban protests entirely as they saying… those numbers will increase because it won’t stop the people and the numbers continue to grow and if you try to stamp it out, there will only be one way it ends… with state authorised violence and death against people protesting the killing of innocent civilians.

      That’s the road you are on with that attitude, and then you’ll be screaming that last line and playing the victim.

    • falseWhite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      It’s not due to legal reasons though. They just decided to exit UK, because they’re trying to avoid paying fines for previous infringements.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        It’s not due to legal reasons though. They just decided to exit UK, because they’re trying to avoid paying fines for previous infringements.

        What previous infringements?

        • falseWhite@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          “The ICO launched its investigation into Imgur in March - saying it would probe whether the companies were complying with both the UK’s data protection laws, and the children’s code.”.

          Just do some research dude

          • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 days ago

            it would probe whether the companies were complying with both the UK’s data protection laws, and the children’s code

            So it was for legal reasons. Wow, such surprise.

            Just do some research dude

            Could you not tell that I wasn’t seriously questioning what the infringements were, and was poking fun at your comment that it wasn’t for legal reasons?

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    I noticed with some basic testing with VPNs that a PC running Linux and a VPN is fairly obscured with no DNS or IP leaks. But when doing the same with an android phone, even with a good VPN, the browser still passes unique identifiers of the phone.

    So I’m thinking the ones who say they can still use imgur are probably accessing it via a PC and not a phone.