• Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Do the shareholders care?

      Cause they just want to squeeze Netflix while they still can before they jump ship. And at that time, Netflix dying and another streaming services surfacing would be ideal for savvy investors.

  • _sideffect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Shit like this is why I don’t feel bad at all for pirating.

    They raise their rates by 65% so they can continue to pay Hollywood actors to make crappy forgettable movies for the service

    • systemglitch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I love seeing the private trackers I use not mentioned here. If other sites have the spotlight, that’s a win.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Don’t forget the 5 BILLION dollars they just gave to WWE, a company that regularly goes to Saudi Arabia. A country so backwards in human rights that they don’t allow women to work. So WWE’s answer to this was to create a tornament just for the women. Called “The Great Moolah Classic”. Only problem with that is, it happened just as the MeToo movement was happening. Now in case you’re unaware, womens pro wrestling from the 1950s through the 1980s was dominated by “The Great Moolah”.

      Btw, I’M not saying she was great. Far from it. Thats just her stage name.

      But if you were a woman, and you wanted to get into womens wrestling between 1950-1985 you NEEDED to go through The Great Moolah. Here’s the problem though.

      You had to live in a camp, where she controlled every aspect of your life from training through retirement. What she did with this control was appalling. She forced them to prostitute themselfs out to not only the male wrestlers, but also the rest of the general public in the area.

      These women then had to give 100% of the money to Moolah, or else they’d be beaten.

      And that’s the tornament they tried to give as the consolation prize for women not being allowed to wrestle in Saudi Arabia. Oh, and when they were forced to change the name, almost IMMEDIATELY, they changed it to The Mae Young Classic. Mae Young was Moolah’s best friend, and one of the people who would help beat the other women. That’s still what it’s called today. When they first introduced the trophy for it, the trophy was intentionally made to look like a vagina. "Here’s your make believe trophy for winning a make believe tornament, as a consolation prize for very real restrictions on making very real money, and we shaped it like your genitals. Snickers, who sponsered the tornament balked when they saw their logo would be on that trophy, and they were forced to redesign it to something more generic. The tornament continues to this day.

      And that’s what Netflix just paid 5 BILLION dollars for. Either 3 or 5 years. I forget which.

      • set_secret@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Holy shit, do you have some more info or refs for this, this sounds unbelievably fucked up.

        • Ech@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Disclaimer: I only know what I just looked up. Not a big wrestling watcher personally.

          From what I can tell there’s two separate titles. The Mae Young Classic had two tournaments in 2017 & 2018. The Great Moolah was announced in 2018, subsequently changing the name to WrestleMania Women’s Battle Royal. It also has only had two tournaments, in 2018 & 2019.

          As for the logo/trophy, WrestleMania Women’s Battle Royal looks like this, and the Mae Young Classic looks like this. I couldn’t find any info on previous versions, but if there was one that looked more like a vagina, it might as well be an anatomical model.

    • firkin_slang_whanger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Care to share what site you use to pirate? I haven’t been in that loop for a while, but all these pricing increases for all these streaming services is driving me back.

  • Geometrinen_Gepardi@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Is it that the decade of 0% interest rates and angel funding for startups lulled us into unrealistically thinking we could get unlimited everything for 9.99 per month, or is it that companies are suddenly starting to rip off people?

    As an end consumer it’s impossible to gauge what is a proper price for entertainment.

    • KazuyaDarklight@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      As with many things, it really is likely a mixture of both. Very possible that 9.99 was unrealistically low, but the current streaming market and “inflation” smoke screening is also enabling some real squeezing of consumers.

    • TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s probably the latter.

      “Delivering shareholder value” has destroyed numerous companies, and I doubt it’ll stop soon.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s simple really

      Is the boss a multimillionaire?

      No: No problem

      Yes: They’re charging more than they need to

      • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        The ads are added in the app. If you cast, the Chromecast can’t add apps (yet) so they’d have to make ad streams instead, and switch between the streams show-ad-show which would take several seconds of loading screen each way and so on. Which is a level of fuckery even they shied away from.

        TLDR they can’t (easily) show ads during casting.

    • kif@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Kind of makes sense - casting is usually a webstream without extra dev effort. I’m not sure if you still can, but I used to circumvent twitch ads by casting from my phone. Not to excuse their shitty behaviour; I gave up on them years ago and started hosting my own content.

  • ForgottenFlux@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Summary:

    • Netflix is discontinuing its cheapest ad-free subscription tier, starting with the UK and Canada, with more countries expected to follow.
    • Netflix has begun notifying users about the last day they can access the service on the Basic plan, prompting them to upgrade to the Standard with ads or more expensive Standard/Premium plans.
    • In Canada:
      • Original Basic plan price: $9.99/month
      • New Standard plan price: $16.49/month
      • New Standard with ads price: $5.99/month
      • Increase from Basic to Standard: $6.50/month (65% increase)
    • In the UK:
      • Original Basic plan price: £7.99/month
      • New Standard with ads price: £4.99/month
      • New Standard plan price: £10.99/month
      • Increase from Basic to Standard: £3.00/month (37.5% increase)
    • The Basic plan ($11.99/month) is no longer available for new US subscribers.
    • Netflix’s ad-supported tier now has 40 million global monthly active users, up from 35 million a year ago.
    • AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Cable companies did the cable model because it was profitable. Netflix and others are slowly realizing that and moving towards it.

      • sudo42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yup. It was the same enshittification process. “Subscribe to cable. We don’t have commercials!” Then a few years later, “Guess what?!? You’re getting commercials!”

  • hornedfiend@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    If that happens,i’ll trakt + jellyfin the hell out of all their shitty shows. Just for kicks.

  • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Netflix has no way to continue growing aside from increasing prices. That is a bad sign. They will just keep squeezing people. Your best bet is to stop subscribing.

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Damn near every tech company and major utility provider has no way of growing aside from squeezing.

      No matter where you turn you will be getting squeezed, and it’ll just get worse every year that regulations don’t catch up.

      And if the U.S. has it’s way, institutional regulation will be a thing of the past as a new wave of unchecked corporate oligarchy begins. And since the U.S’s biggest export is crazy, it’ll just spread…

      Making the future more grim.

      • Taohumor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Anyone care to actually do anything about it? Seems like people are more concerned about abortion and things like that than everyone’s collective livelihood.

        • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Trustbusting would be a solution, but people gotta get behind it. Guess which guy running for President is moving in that direction? Hint: it’s not the billionaire.

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The shareholders are seeking to juice the company and throw it away as usual. Users need to see the writing on the wall and move on.

    • Taohumor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yea tbh it’s business model is gonna be obsolete.

      The bottom line is especially in a trash economy where the rich are bleeding everyone, no one is gonna wanna pay for digital luxuries.

      I only shell out for hardware and food.

      • AWittyUsername@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Streaming is going to end up exactly like cable, it feels inevitable. Adverts, package bundle deals, contracts will be the final thing where they lock you in for a “discount”.

  • Corvidae@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    We now have a collection of maybe 400 DVDs (not pirated, legally purchased). Sure, everything we watch is reruns, but there are no commercials.

  • Trilobite@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I joined the Plex server plan, it’s better and works everywhere and I don’t get price increases or ads

    • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      All the shows that I like I’ve been buying DVD or Blu-rays for, and then I rip them and put them on my Plex server. Just so I can watch some anytime, and not potentially damage the discs.

      I don’t have to worry about geofencing, Don’t have to worry about a price change ever, Don’t have to deal with commercials, Don’t have to think if the shows that I like are going to disappear and maybe show up on a different provider, and generally higher quality audio and video.

        • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’d say no. Because it’s online and attached to your account it can be lost. If for some reason you lose access to your Apple account you lose everything you’ve bought. And a lot of these online services don’t want you to share or transfer your account. So like if you pass away, most of these online services don’t allow you to transfer the account to a living relative (per of the TOS) (granted I doubt there’s much I could do to actually stop you if you just leave them out of it and just give the account to somebody).

        • comfydecal@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I find putting a DVD into a DVD player without having to sign in, have credit, a credit card, and have wifi to be the easiest. Usually costs less too

            • nomous@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Remember those few years when stores had a little machine they could feed the check into and it’d fill everything out for you?

        • lone_faerie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          You’d have to remove the DRM protection to get the same results. But by that point it’s no easier than ripping a blu ray, and with ripping you get the added benefit of having a physical copy.

          • ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Okay that makes sense. I have around 1,000 movies on iTunes so not sure if I’d have all the space for the dvds and would take a pretty long time to rip

            Guess we are all lucky that we have options these days

    • Laser@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I mean I think I know what you mean I also think “digitizing” doesn’t really describe it. Most media nowadays is digital to begin with. Even audio CDs store a digital format.