• eightpix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Assuming right-hand side of road driving and right-hand (anti-clockwise) directionality of travel.

          1. Look left. Clear? Proceed. Not clear? Yield.
          2. When safe to do so, enter the roundabout. Locate your exit.
          3. Exit the roundabout.

          Corollary: never stop in a roundabout. Go around more than once if you have to, but don’t stop.

          I assume roundabouts in Australia and England and UK colonies that drive on the left, all instructions are direction-opposite.

          Assuming left-hand side of road driving and left-hand (clockwise) directionality of travel.

          1. Look right. Clear? Proceed. Not clear? Yield.
          2. When safe to do so, enter the roundabout. Locate your exit.
          3. Exit the roundabout.

          Corollary: never stop in a roundabout. Go around more than once if you have to, but don’t stop.

          • Today@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            In step 1 it’s feels like it’s never clear and i don’t know how long to wait.

            • 🖖USS-Ethernet@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              It’s like a stop sign entering a busy road. You stay stopped until it’s clear. Never mind the impatient people behind you that probably don’t know how to use a roundabout as well. People seem to think that you just enter the roundabout without stopping and people in the roundabout have to yield to them. The people in the roundabout have the right of way so they can get out of it and make room for more.

    • darvit@lemmy.darvit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      As a non-USA person, the existence of a four-way stop has always baffled me. I think it is the peak of awful road design. I don’t think you could make a worse intersection.

      • Confused_Emus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        The rules for how they’re supposed to work sound simple enough on paper. Unfortunately a lot of us in the US have poor reading comprehension skills.

  • tomi000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    That fact that psychedelic drugs like mushrooms and LSD are so so so so much less dangerous than media and politics make them seem.

    They are actually among the safest drugs out there, even when including caffeine and sugar. They can be used in so many ways for self-improvement and treating depressions, anxiety, PTSD and many other conditions.

    It is a real shame that illegal drugs in general have such a bad reputation even though the most harmful drugs (namely alcohol and nicotine) are legal and addictions are completely accepted by society.

    The book ‘How to change your Mind’ by Michael Pollan is a wonderful read on the topic.

      • tomi000@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        LSD and psylocibin work very similarly, they even have cross-tolerance. Schizophrenia and psychosis are some of the few risks you need to watch out for when handling psychedelics. If there is a predisposition present like mental illlnesses running in the family, psychedelics may act as a trigger for those and should be avoided or handled very carefully.

        Also there is no documented overdose with LSD and psylocybe mushrooms either, even with doses as high as hundreds or thousands of recreational doses.

      • ganymede@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        true kindness would be to not demonise and ban entheogentic medicines with thousands of years of contemporary peer review in the sickening pursuit of corporate greed

  • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Maybe it’s not just “one thing”, but ethics. How to make decisions in a systematic way; how to do it in advance; how to weight morality, practicality, and aesthetics to reach a decision that you’ll be satisfied with twenty years later, a decision you could explain and defend to another ethical person before or after the fact.

    • lenz@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Is there something I can read to learn how to do this? A book or course? Or is this something gained only through experience and thought?

      • derek@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Start here: https://nesslabs.com/how-to-think-better This isn’t an endorsement (though I do like ness labs). That article offers practical evidence-based starting points and additional resources at the end.

        There are many people/systems/schools that will offer strategies and solutions. Some are practical and effective. None of them are a replacement for learning what it means to think well, learning how to think well, or actually thinking well.

        The next step is learning the jargon of philosophy so you can ask meaningful questions and parse the answers (this is true for any new discipline). I recommend reading anything on the topics of epistemology, ethics, and aesthetics, which resonate with you. Then find others to discuss what you’ve read. You do not have to be right or knowledgeable to earn a voice in the conversation: only an interest in discovering how you might be wrong and helping others discern the same for themselves.

        If you haven’t read any classical philosophy but are interested I recommend Euthyphro. It’s brief, poignant, and entertaining.

        I hope this helps! Happy to discuss further as well.

  • DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Critical thinking, so everyone could understand that everyone else has their own shit that matters to them.

    The world would be a lot nicer to live in if entire groups of our society didn’t feel this incessant need to convert others to their way of thinking, be it political, cultural, or religious.

    As long as one person isn’t hurting or subjugating another, IDGAF.

    • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      It seems to me groups have people have been choosing a king to do their reasoning for them since the beginning of humanity. And, the application of computers to communications and profits has significantly raised the bar of adequacy for wise decisions while (US) educational efforts have been in decline for nearly a half century.

      How do we encourage the critical mass of free thinkers to break the current paradigm, let alone the ancient one?

      Sincerely, does anyone see some sort of plan here? I often feel like I’m shouting into the void for little more than dying with self-respect. Can we reason our way to revolt, already?

      • DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Can we reason our way to revolt, already?

        `twould be nice, but I see this as requiring a multi-generational solution. We need enough young voters to get out there and vote with their social conscience, to overcome the combined weight of ignorance, money and power.

        • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Seems to me every single time Americans significantly changed their laws, they had to break laws, often pick up firearms, then boycott, illegally enforce their strike’s picket lines, riot and revolt. Perhaps you shouldn’t be speaking of the combined weight of ignorance of society. Maybe your time would be better spent reading a history book rather than attempting to teach.

            • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              I scoped correctly. And, you’re Australian, meaning your government follows where we lead regardless of what you vote for. Bad faith fuck.

              • DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                Jesus, talk about failing to get the point.

                I’m not talking about my government or yours. I’m talking about society making a change for the better. That requires change at a generational level. Bigger guns aren’t the answer - changing people’s thinking is.

                But, by all means, feel free to keep playing the Team America card. That’s what landed that orange-skinned moron in the White House for his first term.

                • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Jesus, talk about failing to answer a simple question. If you don’t know fuck all about how to implement our shared goal, perhaps you should humble the fuck down and learn to ask good questions.

    • How dare u think like this i demand you change your mind.

      In all seriousness tho this would never work cos it is a belief that fundamentally goes against that of those who dont already hold it. I suppose we can use the pardox of tolerance to argue that we should forcefully (using violence if nessasary) convert people to this way of thinking.

    • OneMeaningManyNames@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I agree. It is insane that they don’t make sure people understand computer basics, now that our life is defined by computers. I hate that people are divided to the “tech savvy” and “tech ignorant” camps at work. It makes me question what sci-fi had me believe about “technologically advanced societies”.

  • Mothra@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    To use the bins/trash cans and stop littering. Especially on beaches, parks, reserves and on the motorway.

    • Taalnazi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      Nederlands
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      By extension also, cigarettes, plastic, and aluminium/cardboard. Hate that.

      It’s one thing if it’s compostable fruit, but cigs… do those smokers seriously think it’ll just go away?

    • Ark-5@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      ASL has made a shocking difference in my life, both opening me up as a more accessible person, but also finding a lot of use for it in my own file!!

  • toastal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Digital privacy matters as much as physical privacy & we need to keep the governments & corporations out since they can constantly surveil. Method for doing so need to legal, cheap, & accessible. If decentralization is a requirement, you system that requires Amazon S3 buckets & a beefy VPS are not sufficient when these sorts of things rarely have a technical reason why they couldn’t be democraticized to run from an apartment (why some ISPs don’t let you have an IP (v6 or not) or symetric connections as bits are bits is a different matter).