I reported them for harassment with the following statement:

The purpose of this group is to review bomb any game that has gay representation. Their discussion threads talk about using other platforms to discriminate against LGBTQ+ communities and individuals to circumvent Steam’s TOS policies. This type of behavior promotes discrimination, review brigading, and toxicity. It is surprising Steam is tolerating such open homophobia on this platform.

  • Ech@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Some of their reviews are so petty that I want to believe it’s satire (though I know it’s not). Game has a girl that wants to be an astrophysicist? Woke. PCs fighting equally well regardless of gender? Woke. Literally any POC in the game at all? Woke.

    These people are so fucking pathetic and hateful, it’s mind boggling. I struggle to imagine how they get through a single day without passing out from the shock of seeing all the “woke” things around them.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I WENT OUTSIDE THE OTHER DAY MATE AND DO YOU KNOW WHAT I SAW???

      A FUCKING RAINBOW MATE, RIGHT THERE IN THE SKY!!!

      WHERE KIDDIES COULD SEE IT!!!

      FUCKING WOKEYS!!! THEY MADE THE FUCKING SKY GAY!!!

      😠 😠 😠

    • s38b35M5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Portrays an ‘alternate history’ version of the internet in 1999 which is more ‘inclusive’ than it actually was.”

      LMAO!

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Conservatives didn’t even know how to use a computer in the 90’s. Stormfront was created in 95, but it’s userbase was tiny compared to those private facebook groups today.

    • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can you imagine getting naked and doing the thing with one of these people!!

      It would be like having a conversation with a cardboard box.

  • CTDummy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t worry guys, I’ll sift through all this gay hentai so you guys don’t have to I’m a hero!

    Thanks lad, can’t wait for you to find all the airport toilets that should be avoided so I don’t accidentally wander my way into a BJ.

  • user@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    They are not promoting homophobia. This is so mild, that it’s actually insane you’d count it as that. Just because they let both sides speak means they are anti LGBT? No.

    • enbyecho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just because they let both sides speak…

      Are you the sort of person who feels racists “deserve” to be heard too?

      • user@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Comparing not recommending games based on politics they dont agree with, to racisists. Congratulations.

        • enbyecho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Comparing not recommending games based on politics they dont agree with, to racisists. Congratulations.

          I take it you dug no further than… what, the post here? They make their stance VERY clear.

    • GeneralVincent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re literally anti LGBT though. They are suggesting people not play games because it has LGBT themes, how does this have anything to do with “both sides”? Both sides of what?? I’m gay but most of the games I play have no gay representation, so why would it matter what “side” you’re on unless you’re homophobic and can’t stand seeing someone who’s LGBT?

      • user@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Left and right. Being right wing and prefering not to play/support games that you fundamentally don’t agree with is fair. Its not “homophobic” for them to notice things they personally don’t align with and not recommend it to other people themselves. Even i can see that, and im ftm.

        • GeneralVincent@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nah, still homophobic. Not supporting something you otherwise would, specifically because it has gay people in it is homophobic. It might be part of your political belief, but it’s still homophobic to single out the LGBT themes as a reason to dislike a game. I can see that cuz I’m mtf and bi. And I believe gender and sexuality should even be political in the first place but whatever.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It was literally getting in arms about user generated content that contained pride flags, seems pretty homophobic to me.

      • user@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Define homophobic. If your definition is hating LGBT people, then its not homophobic. They are free to dislike content that contains political topics they generally dont agree with. Thats not homophobia. You gotta be a bit more accepting of contrarian views.

        • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          “Certain groups of people shouldn’t be allowed to exist or show themselves in public” is not a view I am EVER require to respect.

              • user@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                “Oh this race shouldnt exist.” “Oh this political group should be shut down and be banned.”

                Literally the same shit. If you would like to see any group people get opressed then youre no better than a fascist.

                • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You’re the only one talking about groups being shut down and banned, all I’m saying is the exact opposite, that we shouldn’t censor the very existence of a group of people nor should I respect anyone who called for such a thing.

    • Katzastrophe@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If a pride event is “overtly pro lgbtq” we have to also count Fourth of July or even Thanksgiving events as “overtly pro USA”, Lunar New Year as “overtly pro Asia”, and Christmas and Easter as “overtly pro Christianity”.

      Do you see the problem?

      • OrnateLuna@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not op but I don’t particularly see the problem all of those things are true (well I know basically nothing about lunar new years and historical context for it but ye)

        • Katzastrophe@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, that’s my point. None of these things are bad, but if we count one of them as such, we have to accept that other events are also problematic. I would for example really like to see Ramadan events in games, but can you imagine the uproar if that were to become a thing?

    • mugthol@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah it is. Telling other people not to play a game just because it allows the creation of a characrer who is not male or female is pretty homophobic

      • user@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Clearly not. Its possible to not hate and accept something while chosing to not support it at the same time in your communities.

  • heavy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    These weirdos even think there’s an LGBTQ character and boom, instantly triggered. Bonus points for a minority existing as anything else but a target.

  • glitchdx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    548 followers, they’re insignificant. Yeah, they suck, but there’s literally a button to make them go away and you never see them again.

        • PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          And what are those recommendations exclusively based on? Just because two thoughts in a row give you a nosebleed doesn’t mean everyone falls for such lazy apologism.

        • glitchdx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          the cause is to harass lgbt people until they stop existing. This tiny group is doing so by attacking game developers in possibly the most ineffective way possible. If the group follower count was a couple orders of magnitude larger, then I’d be concerned.

    • oatscoop@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Hm, there’s a couple guys spray painting slurs on my neighbor’s house … better close the blinds so I don’t have to look at it.”

      • glitchdx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fallacy of false equivalence. Your example is of actual criminal activity (vandalism) resulting in tangible damages (the vandalized home now needs to be repaired, also surrounding properties lose value due to criminal activity).

        Please feel free to try to make your point again, this time without using a logical fallacy or bad faith argument.

        • oatscoop@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Both are about hateful idiots causing harm to someone else and choosing to ignore it.

          Fallacy of …

          It’s a simile, you dork.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sadly I expect this kinda shit to be normal

    1. I used to get various death threats because of a trans flag in my profile, it’s been replaced by spam scammers
    2. When they didn’t take down the Rittenhouse game that stung a bit…
  • blahsay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Funny thing is, statistically speaking, they’re probably closeted gay themselves.

    Seriously though who cares? It’s not really spreading hate - a lot of closeted or close minded people aren’t comfortable with their sexuality and are going to do this.

    People don’t have to like everything, relax.

    • FuzzyRedPanda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I dunno. I think every list like this ends up helping to normalize hate and bigotry. That said, if I made one of these with a list of Christian games to avoid, it doesn’t mean I hate Christians, it just means that I am looking to avoid games with Christianity in them.

      The difference here is that “woke” is a loaded and weaponized term. It’s like having a list of “groomer” games and then filling that list with games featuring LGBT+ characters. It’s based in bigotry.

      • blahsay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you made a list of these that were offensive to Christians would it be bigotry? What about if it was offensive to Muslims? The left? The right?

        I’m sorry but we aren’t standing on some mountain top where we can dictate that shit. As long as no one is getting hurt and everyone is an adult who are we to judge? I don’t agree, I find it distasteful sure, but it’s narcissistic if I was to think I can judge.

        Let people like and dislike stuff. You’ll only entrench their opinions by restricting them in any case.

        • Grimm@lemmy.zipOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          The whataboutism is strong with this one. People are getting hurt by this group. Choosing to ignore that is your choice.