• SeattleRain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I think this is great and don’t understand why so many people balk at it. Do you think you have an expectation of privacy in a bar? And head counts doesn’t tell you how many coeds are there. And this would add an additional layer of security with more eyes able to catch predators spiking drinks or starting fights.

    • xthexder@l.sw0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Do you want your drunk antics livestreamed and recorded for the entire world to see forever, instead of just the few people in the bar paying attention?

      • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        No, but I’d prevent that by not having drunk antics. It’s not like other people in the bar can’t see you.

        • jvw@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          If you have nothing to fear, etc etc…

          You could also prevent a hostile employer from seeing you out with your same-sex partner by pretending you don’t have one.

          Or, keep your honey from finding out about your side piece by putting a mask on their head…

          blobcat, rollingeyes

          • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Filing you in public is not a violation of your privacy especially in a limited scope like a single club. That’s not at all equivalent to saying I should be able to read your emails.

            Public safety needs to be weighed against civil rights. I don’t think women should be drugged because of a extreme fundamentalist a paranoid interpretation of privacy rights.

            Also people want to club where it’s happening. Even if a club has a lot of people they could still not be dancing.

            • xthexder@l.sw0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              I don’t know what bars you frequent, but I’m pretty sure if someone was in there filming strangers they could be kicked out. It depends what kind of place you’re in. Filming in a strip club for example would obviously be against the rules. Bars are not publicly owned spaces, and you do have some expectation of privacy in them.

              • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                You’re out of touch, just visit nearly any page on Instagram to see hours of footage of clubbing and bar hopping.

                • xthexder@l.sw0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  Well maybe I am out of touch. I don’t frequent bars like I used to.

                  How many of those Instagram posts are of strangers? If people record themselves at bars and post it, why should I care?

            • jvw@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Public safety needs to be weighed against civil rights

              Oooo a tankie!

              . I don’t think women should be drugged because of a extreme fundamentalist a paranoid interpretation of privacy rights.

              Oooo a straw man reducto ad absurdum argument!

              Blocked. Buhbye🤖

              • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                I’m not a tankie. And clubs already do their own closed circuit TV surveillance. And no my argument is not reducto ad absurdum. There is a growing and pervasive problem with drugging drinks in American bars. I only brought it up as a side benefit anyway. I’d really like the convenience of seeing how hot a bar is instead of having to pay to get in only to see that it’s lame and leave.

                • ruse8145@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  You strike me as a very youthful cop tbh, full of weird ideas of how the world works and with righteous belief that you are right and anyone who has a different pov is wrong… But that’s just based on this thread.

  • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    “Just go to a fucking bar,” she added, seeming to balk at the purpose of the app. “And if it’s not cool you go to another bar.”

    I’d rather not. A way to find a nice bar without having to visit several would be nice, not sure having it all live streamed online is the solution

  • Boozilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I like being able to check how busy a place is, but not like this. Simple head count or an average wait time is good. Using web cams is creepy overkill. Typical tech bro invasive shit.

  • podperson@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Easy choice now of which bars to avoid. Hopefully they lose business over it but I doubt it.

    • Jesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      As the article indicates, it’s catering to the crowd that wants a packed bar fully of people infatuated with whatever is trending in pop culture.

      Lemmy’s user base of bean loving software engineers is not that crowd.

  • woelkchen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    So San Francisco just invented the webcam? (Btw, Google Maps already shows how busy establishments are.)

  • Pacmanlives@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I know of a few bars that have/used to have web streams of the bar. Most of them started in the 90s and 00s and I can’t remember if they shut them off after a certain hour or not. Buddy of mine in Florida would go to one of these locations have a cocktail in front of the camera and wave at us while we would freezing our asses off in the northern Midwest

  • CrazyLikeGollum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m generally in favor of privacy, but a bar is public place. There is no reasonable expectation of privacy. Unless they’re putting cameras in the bathrooms, I don’t see how this is an issue. They likely already have security cameras that are recording, this just makes some of those publicly viewable. Other than an additional layer of convenience, how is this any different from walking into a bar, seeing it’s packed, and leaving.

    • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Fuck that. It absolutely is not a norm to have anyone with an internet connection watch you drink, and making a camera publicly accessible should automatically revoke your liquor license and permanently bar the owner from ever being able to apply for one again.

    • helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The potential for misue is too great.

      Security cams are not available to anyone - only the bar staff has (hopefully limited) access to the video. While everything is recorded, unless something happens you can be confident the video will end up deleted.

      There’s a difference from being watched by some creep through the window and being watched by a dozen creeps wanking off to you in a basment.

      • CrazyLikeGollum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I would say the potential for misuse, while definitely present, is outweighed by the potential benefits.

        A creep watching you from their basement is less likely to act on their dangerous impulses.

        An overcrowded bar, poses a lot of risks in itself and the ability to determine how crowded the bar is without having to be physically present can mitigate your exposure to those risks.

        In a crowded bar you have a higher risk of being drugged or assaulted because security and staff will likely be distracted or simply unable to notice and intervene. Also, in the event of an emergency that requires you to be able exit quickly, such as a fire or earthquake not only will it be much more difficult to leave it’s also more likely that people will panic and exasperate the problem.

        Is a camera with a public live feed the best way to achieve that? No, probably not. But it’s simple, cheap, and gets the job done.

        A bar is also a public venue. In a public place you have absolutely no reasonable expectation of privacy. So, while in most circumstances it’s unreasonable to expect that you’re being recorded, it’s equally unreasonable to expect that you’re not.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          You don’t need a video feed to determine how busy a place is. Google maps already does this via people with location reporting turned on.

    • Aa!@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m shocked at what an unpopular thought this is. Like… If you go out in public, there’s a very real risk that people in public will see you. If that’s a concern you have, then you should take steps to not be seen in public. To me, that would mean not making my presence obvious when visiting a bar.

      Camera or not, if people are looking for you, they will find ways to look for you in public places. You should always assume you’re being watched, because you probably already are.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    A weird new app lets San Francisco residents monitor local bars via live video feed to see what’s happening there and to check how busy the venues are.

    2Nite, which launched earlier this year, uses a network of cameras at various Bay Area establishments to provide remote insights into what’s happening at those locations.

    In fact, some local bar patrons have predictably been a bit perturbed (creeped out, even) by an app that remotely monitors them and streams their drunken revelry to an unknown amount of strangers on the internet.

    “You should be able to let loose in a bar where Big Brother isn’t watching you,” a young woman told the Standard when asked about the app.

    Lucas Harris, the co-founder of 2Nite, has said that businesses that partner with the app are in control of the cameras and that the feeds are mainly meant to “offer a glimpse of live shows at bars, clubs, and other event venues,” the Standard writes.

    Harris and his co-founder, Francesco Bini, also told the outlet they had introduced live stream blurring to anonymize the feeds and keep individual partygoers from being identified.


    The original article contains 356 words, the summary contains 189 words. Saved 47%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!