Donald Trump’s overarching narrative for the debate was that Joe Biden has diminished U.S. power by opening the border and allowing millions of “Illegal immigrants” released “From prisons, jails and mental institutions” to come into the country to “Take our jobs,” overwhelm our health care and Social Security systems, and rape and kill us.
Rather than pointing out Trump’s utter lack of concern for people’s well-being, Biden’s rebuttal fell into the trap of trying to respond to Trump’s tirades, allowing the former president to control the agenda and tone of the debate.
Trump used this as an opportunity to point out how little progress has been made under Biden and that Biden helped drive these disparities through his embrace of the “Superpredator” myth in the 1990s.
While many in the Biden administration and its key constituencies favor dialing back criminalization, they feel that it is politically impossible to state that clearly and openly, leaving the president to quietly support some good programs, while publicly leaning into a police-centered crime control strategy that will never be able to compete with Trump’s undiluted authoritarianism.
Biden’s weak policies and incoherent responses during the debate may give us another four years of Trump and his drive to turn the U.S. into a despotic kleptocracy.
Such an ignorant, lazy take.
How the heck are they complaining about biden’s take on immigration when he increased the border control budget so much despite Republican protests against border control?
What happened is the opposite of what this article is talking about.
“Biden’s weak policies and incoherent responses during the debate may give us another four years of Trump”
No, the election May give us another 4 years of trump.
It’s an election.
Biden has very strong immigration policies, this article doesn’t know what it’s talking about.
It’s fawx news light. What do you expect?
It’s CNN, hardly a right leaning news organization
I would point out that CNN has become increasingly right leaning this past decade, but I recognize your username as one of the unfortunate few right-wing types that has inexplicable decided to dip your toes into the Fediverse.
Don’t really think you’re welcome here.
Lol, so anyone that has opinions that you don’t like aren’t welcome here? Okay…
In general one shouldn’t be welcoming to authoritarians, no.
Biden regularly ignores the express will of his constituents with regards to Israel, drug decriminalization, judicial overreach, tax reform, and immigration. His DOJ just forced a foreign national to plead guilty under US espionage laws. That’s all authoritarian as hell.
Also, the article specifically mentions policing and criminalization with regards to immigration and your response is that he TRIED to increase funding to ICE but the right wouldn’t let him. But that’s the whole point - more cops is not the answer. Abolish ICE. Giving them more money is the same solution Trump wants to implement. You realize we’re still putting kids in cages, right?
I looked to see if I was welcome here and this is what I found… The Fediverse is a decentralized, federated social network where individuals can connect with others who share similar interests and values. It’s a space where people from all walks of life can come together, share their thoughts, and engage in respectful discussions.
No discrimination or exclusivity
The Fediverse is built on the principles of inclusivity and diversity. There is no central authority controlling the network, and each server (or instance) is run independently by its administrators. This means that each server can set its own rules and guidelines, but there is no overarching policy that discriminates against individuals based on their political beliefs, including Republicans.
Diverse perspectives and communities
The Fediverse is home to a wide range of communities and servers, each with its own unique character and focus. You can find servers dedicated to specific topics, hobbies, or interests, as well as servers that cater to specific political ideologies or beliefs. This diversity allows individuals to connect with like-minded people and engage in discussions that resonate with them.
“There’s no overarching policy banning you” /=/ “You’re welcome where decent people frequent”
If you have a sense of pattern recognition, I’m sure you’ll realize this. Eventually.
I looked to see if I was welcome in the fediverse and this is what I found… The Fediverse is a decentralized, federated social network where individuals can connect with others who share similar interests and values. It’s a space where people from all walks of life can come together, share their thoughts, and engage in respectful discussions.
No discrimination or exclusivity
The Fediverse is built on the principles of inclusivity and diversity. There is no central authority controlling the network, and each server (or instance) is run independently by its administrators. This means that each server can set its own rules and guidelines, but there is no overarching policy that discriminates against individuals based on their political beliefs, including Republicans.
Diverse perspectives and communities
The Fediverse is home to a wide range of communities and servers, each with its own unique character and focus. You can find servers dedicated to specific topics, hobbies, or interests, as well as servers that cater to specific political ideologies or beliefs. This diversity allows individuals to connect with like-minded people and engage in discussions that resonate with them.
Strong immigration policies? It took him 3.5 years to do anything about the border after undoing everything Trump had in place. And Republicans were the first ones that came up with a border plan that would actually work called HR2. Dems shut it down.
Remember when the Democrats offered the Republicans every single thing they wanted on immigration and they voted against it because Trump wanted them to?
Oops. Guess they could have gotten their border plan that you claim would have worked and decided to not do it because it wasn’t politically expedient.
Wrong. They didn’t offer Republicans everything they wanted. That’s just completely false. HR2 was a much better bill at getting the border under control, or even just reinstating the executive actions Trump had in place before Biden took office.
Ah, the “we didn’t get a rainbow and a pony” defense.
You’re just repeating the MSM talking points. Keep drinking the koolaid
Dude, you’re regurgitating shit from an AI as if it’s true. You have no room to criticize anyone’s so-called talking points.
Republicans: we don’t know, separate children from there families, let some of the kids die, cause generational trauma while withholding funding and processing.
Biden: let’s clean up the Republicans mess again, and change that in favor of fair and rational l expedited immigration processing with limited capacity per day that keeps families together.
So yeah Trump did immigration “first” If you pretend he had a sound immigration policy, which he didn’t, he preferred detention and ignoring the problem, and you also ignore every president before him and then also you laud irresponsible choices that harm people and cost more money.
Trump kept a lot of them out of the country, and you’re pretty naive if you think kids aren’t getting separated from families or getting killed now. Human a sex trafficking are at an all time high right now. And detention at least kept them from killing and raping our citizens.