Apple has called for the European Commission to repeal a swathe of technology legislation, warning that unless it is amended the company could stop shipping some products and services to the 27-country bloc.

The Silicon Valley company hit out in a submission to the commission’s review of the three-year-old anti-monopoly legislation, which is intended to regulate the gatekeeper power of the largest digital companies including search engines, app providers and messaging services.

It said it had already delayed the launch of features such as live translation through AirPods and mirroring iPhone screens on to laptop because of the act’s demands for interoperability with non-Apple products and services.

“The DMA means the list of delayed features in the EU will probably get longer, and our EU users’ experience on Apple products will fall further behind,” it said. Apple added that Brussels was creating unfair competition as the rules were not applied to Samsung, the largest smartphone provider in the EU.

  • egrets@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    I like my iPhone. It’s solid hardware and reasonably capable software. It does everything I need it to do, and gives me really solid control over API access to privacy-centric controls like location and microphone.

    I still wouldn’t skip a beat to switch to another phone manufactured by another company (though I regret how much of a duopoly there is). The inconvenience is minor; Apple just needs to give me a shove and I’ll switch.

  • Meldrik@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    They would never stop selling their products in Europe lol. And if they did, I wouldn’t care, even though I own a few Apple products.

    • shrugs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      You should never pay a blackmailer, because that incentives blackmailing. Still, everyone pays, because that causes the least pain

      Same with this, they can bluff all they want; in the end, they won’t not sell their devices in Europe, because that would mean lost profit and the least pain is complying.

      Go die in a dirty back alley apple, you deserve it

    • Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      Yeah, we don’t really have systemic/infrastructure dependency on Apple. Compared to Microsoft (which we are dependant upon atm) who can and does extort the EU a bit everywhere it can.

      That’s why foss all the things!

  • LordOfLocksley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    Don’t threaten me with a good time Apple.

    It’s just empty threats though. The EU market is bigger than America (considering population sizes only), there is no way they’d give up on that

    • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      Given android id more popular in Europe than America, you could say apple is behind in market share, so providing less features is not a great business plan.

      • mesa@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        19 days ago

        I’m sure fairphone would love this senario.

        I can only hope that a 3rd os rises to compete with google and apple. A true Linux phonebwould be a huge boon.

      • Cyphierre@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        If Apple is behind in market share then how are they being penalized as a monopoly more than Samsung?

  • falseWhite@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    They’re just bluffing, they’d lose more money by withdrawing from the EU market, than finding ways to comply. Greedy corporations are easy to predict, since their only goal is money and they don’t do things “out of principle”.

  • Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    Just the evil nature of a megacorp manifesting in monology tenancies.

    Anti-monopoly laws are at most too loose atm, not too strict.

    (Also the threat is just a threat, they’ve been saying that for a decade now.)