ccunning@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 month agoDisney shareholders demand reasons for Kimmel suspensionwww.semafor.comexternal-linkmessage-square73linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkDisney shareholders demand reasons for Kimmel suspensionwww.semafor.comccunning@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square73linkfedilink
minus-squareProprietary_Blend@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoDoes the first amendment protect novelty television?
minus-squarephoenixarise@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoDon’t bother with the sad, low-effort troll. This is the most attention they’ve gotten since they slid from their mother’s rotten twat. They’re not worth it.
minus-squarezarathustrad@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoYes, the existence of Fox “news” and most right wing radio proves it.
minus-squaredohpaz42@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoIt does when it’s the government who is making calls to cancel shows.
Does the first amendment protect novelty television?
… yes? Very much indeed so?
I didn’t know. Thanks.
Don’t bother with the sad, low-effort troll. This is the most attention they’ve gotten since they slid from their mother’s rotten twat. They’re not worth it.
Yes, the existence of Fox “news” and most right wing radio proves it.
It does when it’s the government who is making calls to cancel shows.