Hatshepsut@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 13 days agoTrump reveals Murdochs and Dell could potentially take part in TikTok dealapnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square21linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkTrump reveals Murdochs and Dell could potentially take part in TikTok dealapnews.comHatshepsut@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 13 days agomessage-square21linkfedilink
minus-squareShalashaska@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-213 days agoThe Wall Street Journal is a very MAGA newspaper that happens to have some good journalists. I mean, look at what they published over the last two decades: There’s no compelling scientific argument for drastic action to ‘decarbonize’ the world’s economy. https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052970204301404577171531838421366 Climate Science is not settled https://www.wsj.com/articles/climate-science-is-not-settled-1411143565 Global warming doesn’t matter. Contrary to the latest news, the evidence that global warming will have serious effects is thin. https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB119258265537661384 The Climate-Change Religion President Obama wrote in his proclamation for Earth Day on Wednesday. “As a Nation, we must act before it is too late.” Obama is wrong. There is no reason to act. https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-climate-change-religion-1429832149 No, climate change has not caused an increase in the frequency or intensity of floods, droughts, hurricanes and tornadoes. This is a false claim. https://www.wsj.com/articles/notable-quotable-climate-change-and-war-1461021491 What is the origin of the false belief — constantly repeated — that almost all scientists agree about global warming? There is actually no scientific consensus on global warming https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303480304579578462813553136 I’m paying subscriber of the New York Times. I also read the Financial Times. They never published anything close to this trash.
The Wall Street Journal is a very MAGA newspaper that happens to have some good journalists.
I mean, look at what they published over the last two decades:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052970204301404577171531838421366
https://www.wsj.com/articles/climate-science-is-not-settled-1411143565
https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB119258265537661384
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-climate-change-religion-1429832149
https://www.wsj.com/articles/notable-quotable-climate-change-and-war-1461021491
https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303480304579578462813553136
I’m paying subscriber of the New York Times. I also read the Financial Times.
They never published anything close to this trash.