return2ozma@lemmy.world to United States | News & Politics@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoWill the Debate This Week Be ‘Rah-Rah’ or ‘Ruh-Roh?’www.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkWill the Debate This Week Be ‘Rah-Rah’ or ‘Ruh-Roh?’www.nytimes.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to United States | News & Politics@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square10fedilinkfile-text
minus-squaredelirious_owl@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoI, for one, haven’t seen a few of the US candidates at a debate.
minus-squareatzanteol@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoThere are two candidates. No, the others are not viable. Yes I know that’s unfair. Yes voting for them is basically not voting and potentially helps another candidate you “hate more” to win instead.
minus-squaredelirious_owl@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoThere are more than 2 candidates.
I, for one, haven’t seen a few of the US candidates at a debate.
There are two candidates. No, the others are not viable. Yes I know that’s unfair. Yes voting for them is basically not voting and potentially helps another candidate you “hate more” to win instead.
There are more than 2 candidates.