We all hate google and youtube, but overall as a community we’re all simultaneously lukewarm and non-committal about pushing towards using an alternative. I admittedly cling to invidious frontends for dear life.

It seems like whenever somebody asks for an alternative to youtube, they’re offered Odysee and Peertube, but inevitably many others chime in about the shortcomings of both of those platforms.

Can we as a community come to a consensus as to which of these platforms should be pushed forward?

I don’t even think it needs to be a binary choice. Obviously youtube cannot be immediately replaced for it’s archival of educational and tutorial videos, but we can at least push newcomers towards using invidious frontends for those instances.

Maybe Odysee is better for some type of content over Peertube. Let’s discuss which platform works best for what and try to be more active about sharing and promoting them not just to viewers but potential creators as well.

If you go to share a youtube link, try to see if that video exists on an alternate platform first and share that link instead. I think that’s a good first step towards getting away from youtube in the privacy community.

But youtube alternatives are still very much on the fringe and I’m hoping this post will at least inspire some discussion about changing that.

  • ertai@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Peertube. Then, you can use a peertube search engine like Sepia search to search across many peertube instances, replicating the youtube user interface. Sepia search has a long way to go but if peertube grows it will get there. Searching technology is already a solved problem.

  • Broken@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I think one of the biggest challenges is alternate choices for creators. If everybody posted their content to YT plus another platform, things would naturally start shifting.

    If a channel I follow posts to Odysee then I watch it there. I follow multiple channels that also post to Nebula, so I try to watch it there.

    But there’s no clear standard for what platforms are good for what. There’s also a paywall issue with some (like aforementioned Nebula) that not everybody will be able to pay. I’ve also tried Curiosity Stream, and never watched it because there was no content I found worth it.

    Then there’s the technical issues. I can’t believe that I am paying for Nubula when their app sucks so badly. (I will probably cancel but haven’t yet). Odysee is so much better than when it launched but it’s still a pile of dung. PeerTube I never felt worked well at all, so much so that maybe I’m missing something. But while I might not be the sharpest tool in the shed if I can’t figure it out then its a bad platform.

    So in all reality, there isn’t a replacement for YT. I wish there was, but there isn’t. There should be, but there isn’t. Yes, we should try to post alternate links and such, but that’s not going to make much of a difference in the end.

    And sorry, this all came out significantly negative sounding. I don’t mean to be crapping on the post or the idea. I just mean to point out that the issue is much deeper than user interactions. There’s an infrastructure problem first (we need a viable working alternative), then a content problem second (we need to convince creators to move there), and only last is there a user interaction issue (which this post is discussing).

  • krunklom@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    So. Some unfortunate news here. There was never a time to be on YouTube in the first place.

  • qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I think piracy is the answer. If a creator is not on odysee, make a channel of the same name an re-upload all their content, everyone can do it basically for free. If you run a peertube instance, pick a few youtube channels you like and mirror them to your instance and keep them updated with something like ChannelTube or TubeSync.

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    What about Nebula? It’s paid subscription but you can pay for once off lifetime subscription for $300, and the content creators even encourage users to opt for the latter. Edit: wording

    • EnsignWashout@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Nebula is terrific!

      It does take some time to find everything. It’s not (much of) an algorithm, so I just had to explore and start subscribing to things.

    • pathief@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Is the video catalog larger for paid customers?

      I searched for my topics of interest and hobbies but barely got any hit.

      Sucks they don’t have a trial period.

      • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        I searched for my topics of interest and hobbies but barely got any hit.

        Oh yeah, it is worth noting that Nebula doesn’t have as many options as in YouTube, I’m afraid. That is the limitation of platform. New content creators do come in to Nebula but not as often as it would be on YouTube.

        Personally, I love nebula because it does have the topics I am interested in, which is mainly history, news, video games and politics. There are also long form video essays on variety of topics. I would say that Nebula is more like nerdy because of prevalence of those topics. I haven’t come across Nebula videos that are more niche like, let’s say, woodworking or metalworking etc. I do photography but I think there is only one Nebula content creator that does photography.

    • magguzu@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Nebula fucks, I had been putting off the lifetime sub for ages and finally bit the bullet one day and I’ve been using it more than YouTube. Feels good knowing the creators get more stake in it and are literal stakeholders without all the alrogithm nonsense.

      They’ve made it seem like the lifetime sub won’t be around forever though, worth noting.

  • fodor@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    No consensus. We should never look for that, because we need diversity in options and usage.

    Discussion is peachy tho.

  • recklessengagement@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I am trying to - there’s no direct replacement, but I’ve removed the YouTube app from my phone at least. Also signed up for both Nebula and Dropout, which both do some sort of direct profit sharing with creators.

  • Professorozone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    So you can get actual YouTube content without the ads? Does it include an ad blocker or is it inherently resistant to ads?

  • Bronstein_Tardigrade@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    During my DeGoogling, dumping YouTube was easy, and was made easier when they started permanently banning leftist feeds like Party Girls. The struggle for me was Google Maps. Lots of substitutes, and I do use CoMaps, but none are quite as slick as the Google version…yet.

  • moseschrute@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Nebula might be worth the $5/month. The platform is run by the creators, so that money goes to them. DM me if you’re interested. I can gift you a free week.

    • EnsignWashout@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Nebula is great.

      It’s pretty funny to watch a quick “check out our extended content on Nebula” video exit, then just immediately watch the extended content roll along with a thank you message. (Many creators simply add the Nebula exclusive bits directly to the end of the video, on Nebula.)

      It makes me feel like a fancy rich person.

    • mapu@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Nebula is great. Lots of original content, varied catalog and you get to see lots of stuff before it comes out on YouTube (if it even does, as there’s also extended Nebula-only videos)

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    The very platform you’re clinging to is on Death’s Door and they’re actively breaking YouTube’s terms of service while still using the service.

    None of the other platforms are even close to replacing YouTube. They can’t handle the scale or the features. And none of them are heading towards being able to accomplish this.

    YouTube is a capitalist utopia funded with more money than God. They provide unlimited free storage and transmission of all videos sent to their platform. They fleece videos for copyright and legal impingements. They gather corporations willing to spend on advertisements and link them directly to end users uploading data, and when they reach a threshold, they pay them.These funds pay for the unlimited amounts of storage at levels that no other platform could handle.

    The other platforms that are open to us don’t make enough money to do any of those things. We’re relying on the funding, development, and administration of a couple of generous strangers.

    • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      This. I’ll leave YouTube when I can have a similar experience and support all of my favorite content creators somewhere else. Until then, everything else is just a lame video hosting site I’m not interested in.

    • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      I don’t disagree with anything you’ve said, but IMO it’s not the whole story.

      You’re correct that youtube is not going to be dethroned in the foreseeable future. The thing is, I don’t want an open platform to replace youtube, I just want some content to be available on that open platform.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        There are a couple of peertube servers that aren’t horrible. TILVids is particularly decent.

        But until somebody works out monetization for these people, it’s probably going to be Slim Pickings.

        At a minimum, peertube is going to need to support private videos for Patreon to have proper effect.

    • dogs0n@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I’m not sure how Peertube works, but from my current knowledge, torrents seem like a great (and obvious?) option, especially from an archival pov.

      Not sure that streaming them is great (mostly for skipping around), but theres a lot of streaming players out now, maybe it’s good now with well seeded torrents.

      If I’m being naive, I would love to know in which ways.

  • rarsamx@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Nothing can compare yet to YouTube.

    The main reason is: YouTube is not only a distribution channel. It is also its own promotion channel tied to a search engine which magnifies that promotion.

    You open YouTube and it offers similar videos tho what you’ve been watching. You search for something and there is probably a video (or many( matching what you are searching.

    Other platforms are currently only distribution channels. You upload the video and promote it through other channels. Whether your own website or posts somewhere else.

    Si, if you are a content producer and want to share, the current fediverse solutions are great, however it will need critical mass to attract content consumers.

    And without content consumers, it will be hard to attract content providers who want a broad distribution and exposure.

    So, let’s start moving out own content to the fediverse and use other channels to promote them. Let’s create a snowball effect. We could even post to several and see where the content consumers gravitate to.

    • plyth@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      however it will need critical mass to attract content consumers.

      My guess is that that’s the reason why OP wants to focus on one platform. Pick a winner and bring the traffic.