• kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    prosecuted for disclosing students and faculty information on what is free speech. No one is legally required to take a political position thats favorable to zionists or jews. Thats been the elephant in the room this whole time. In shipping that info they abetted in a legally unsanctioned activity.

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago
        1. civil rights violations for impinging on protestor/employees right of free political speech which clearly do not violate any of the exceptions to free speech. The feds and berkeley admins would have to prove that holding a sign that supports palestinian civil rights, freedoms, and ending a violent conflict violates Title 6 of the civil rights act as antisemitism. I doubt the government will be able to pull that off, but its about time they tried it and got their arse kicked for it. It’ll be a nice precedent.
        2. Unreasonable search and seizure of their “papers, houses, persons, and effects” by the government.
        3. Shortly they will likely be a party to malicious prosecution and baseless retaliation, which will be tried in a California court, where they will absolutely win.

        I wouldnt place any bets that they “violated no laws”.