A new paper published in The Lancet — one of the world’s most respected health journals — finds that sanctions imposed by the West on developing countries have caused 38 million deaths since 1971.
Also, fun fact, but according to his own public statements Osama Bin Laden was radicalized by the Reagan’s sanctions and their effects on Iraq. (ie, mass starvation)
In other words, Reaganomics contributed to Islamic terrorism.
Or, to make it clickbaity-ish, “caused”.
Honestly, these types of methodology sections go over my head. How do they distinguish between “deaths caused by sanctions” and “deaths caused by sanctioned regimes?”
I skimmed the paper; it doesn’t look like they did.
Further, it doesn’t look like they studied changes in mortality when sanctions were lifted, nor in neighboring unsanctioned regions. They jumped right from correlation to causation. This seems to be “post hoc, the paper”.
“the west”? huge tell there regarding OP. That wording doesn’t appear in the paper.
Confirms something I’ve strongly suspected about you.
25% of all countries were subject to some type of sanctions by either the USA, the EU, or the UN in the 2010–22 period
It’s right in the intro, though it doesn’t specify “The West” specifically, it is an apt summary.
Also this was a .ml crosspost, but I did not find the title to be misrepresentative, so I left it
Confirms something I’ve strongly suspected about you.
If what I think you’re hinting about is what you’re hinting about, you might not have come across my work yet
It’s right in the intro
It very clearly isn’t
this was a .ml crosspost
There it is
Very obviously, the problem is that you posted an article to a science community with an editorialized headline rather than the article’s original headline. Whether you feel it is or is not accurately representative is beside the point.
I see your point, I have adjusted the post to the paper title and moved the original title to the body
Now count how many deaths were prevented.
