Yeah they do, although CBR performs noticeably worse than VBR with Lame MP3. As I mentioned elsewhere, MP3 @ V0 or V1 VBR sounds just as good as the above. I just personally haven’t used MP3 for years because the newer codecs are more efficient.
VBR is always preferable over CBR, no matter video or audio encoding. I use OPUS a lot. Also YouTube providing OPUS 160 VBR as audio stream option for all of its content is very handy.
Oh yeah. 128k rips from back then were rough. MP3 has gotten somewhat better then, to be fair. V0 VBR is still perfectly fine to listen to; it’s just not as efficient as the newer codecs.
Conversely low res audio clearly sounds like trash.
Up to a certain point, yes. >192k AAC / OGG / Opus sounds just as good as FLAC in a blind test, though. Even with good equipment.
256/320 MP3s also do well. 128 MP3s not so much.
Yeah they do, although CBR performs noticeably worse than VBR with Lame MP3. As I mentioned elsewhere, MP3 @ V0 or V1 VBR sounds just as good as the above. I just personally haven’t used MP3 for years because the newer codecs are more efficient.
VBR is always preferable over CBR, no matter video or audio encoding. I use OPUS a lot. Also YouTube providing OPUS 160 VBR as audio stream option for all of its content is very handy.
Yeah, I’m thinking of circa 2000 MP3s. 128k was the good stuff and lower was still common.
Oh yeah. 128k rips from back then were rough. MP3 has gotten somewhat better then, to be fair. V0 VBR is still perfectly fine to listen to; it’s just not as efficient as the newer codecs.
Back when a 4 minute song was like 1.5MB so you could fit more music on your 256MB mp3 player because you could not afford an iPod.