• FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m not trying to have the cake and eat it, I’m trying to convince people like you not to shit on the cake just because you think you might be able to eat around it.

    • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      What?

      Why am I getting down votes?
      How am I shitting on anything? What am I even shitting on? \

      All I’m doing is asking “why do we shit on teriffs and treat them as inherently bad?”
      Im trying to have a discussion in good faith, and rather than having any of my questions explained or answered I’m just down voted and vaguely demeaned.

      I’m being very clear I do not support whatever shit trump is doing, I’m trying to understand why people just hate tariffs.
      I don’t understand how, if the importer bares all tariff costs, what would disincentivize a foreign nation from exporting to us since they bear no increased costs. Why would this not just appear as a decrease in demand, from their perspective?

      • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I literally explained it to you in simple terms and you still argued against the facts.

        Tariffs

        Shit on

        USA Commerce and Industry

        They cannot ever be a replacement for taxation. Their uses are purely as a defence from foreign fuckery in the markets.

        • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          You didn’t provide facts, you provided arguments and assertions.
          Then I refuted one of your arguments showing how it is seemingly contradicted one of your assertions and asked for elaboration.

          I don’t understand where your hostility is coming from. I’m not even saying you’re wrong, I’m pointing out arguments that don’t appear (to me) to lead to your conclusion.

          I absolutely don’t refute that Trump’s idea is a bad one. My question is more general than that.

          • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            The hostility is coming because of you advocating harm on a massive scale and refusing that you might be wrong. Also why you’re getting those downvotes. Stop asking about Trump. I used Trump as an example, but we’ve explained to you that Tariffs are bad in general.

            • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Ok, I see the problem; you’re not reading my replies.

              I have been bending over backwards to make it clear I’m not advocating anything in general, and that I don’t support trump or his suggestion in specific.

              You keep saying that you’ve explained tariffs in general, but most of what you’ve done is just assert they’re bad and then claim that you’ve explained it, but if you haven’t been reading my replies then of course you wouldn’t have read the questions I’ve asked about the explanations you did provided

              • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                You think tariffs aren’t that bad. That’s your stance. I’ve explained to you that tariffs are bad, albeit sometimes necessary. There is no confusion here. You can’t explain it, because you’re wrong.

                • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  No, again.

                  I didn’t make a stance, I didn’t say they’re not that bad. I asked why everyone immediately shit on them, and then I asked for more information when your examination seemed contradictory in one area.

                  You keep putting words in my mouth and getting angry at me for them.

                  I gave me a reasonable explanation at first, and then when I asked for clarification about a part that seemed contradictory to me, I was immediately met with anger, accusations, and a repeated claim that all my questions had been answered.

                  Someone else actually gave me a pretty decent answer, but then they deleted their reply before I could follow up with them 😢. It was more about posturing than about economics (although when governments posture, economics are always impacted)