• ChallengeApathy@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Nine times out of ten, it’s not that anyone is scared of the LGBT community. We just recognize the negative impacts their activism is having on society (especially kids) and we get sick of having a completely contrary worldview shoved down our throats.

    • InternetUser2012@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Weird, religion has been shoved down my throat and I’m not religious. You do realize you can’t make someone gay right? Just like you can’t make someone gay straight. How many hours per day to watch fox “news”, be honest.

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Well grease up that throat twinkle toes, because a lot of your kids are fucking gay as hell, because that shits in the DNA, not in how ignorant and homophobic your dumbass parents are. Good luck!

    • Sas [she/her]@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      So what you’re saying is you’re scared of the supposed negative impacts on society. The negative impact being less people are depressed and less people kill themselves as they can openly be who they are without someone shoving their heteronormative worldview based on misinformation down their throats. Interesting stance to take

    • Phegan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Real alpha males don’t exist. The study on wolves having alphas have been proven wrong my most.othet subsequent studies.

      • Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Well…

        Alpha wolves definitely don’t exists, but there is support for “alpha” behaviour in primates, particularly chimpanzees.

        “Alpha” is still a stupid and harmful idea, but it’s not without precedent.

        • Phegan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          They also found in other chimpanzees that alphas don’t exist. I think we are both in agreement that it’s a stupid construct to apply to humans though.

  • Num10ck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    ‘alpha males’ find that they cannot use their typical lazy tools for wiping out competition when dealing with such adversaries. violence against them is unacceptable. filthy rumors aren’t damaging.

  • urska@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    If you’re so strong why you need the whole world for a month to back up your life decisions, lmao

  • TangledHyphae@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    1 Corinthians 6:9 Or do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor men who have sex with men 10 nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. 11 And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.

    1 Corinthians 6:9 The words men who have sex with men translate two Greek words that refer to the passive and active participants in homosexual acts.

    • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      How many threads are you wearing? Do you kill your kids when they dont obey you? Think owning slaves is fine as long as they survive a couple days after you beat them?

    • Liz@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Is that the “lay with another man” bit? I’m pretty sure there’s arguments over the original text, and scholars think it originally meant “don’t have sex with little boys” not don’t have sex with men.

      • TangledHyphae@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        It’s very specific, and it’s in many places across the entire Bible. It’s written with the same concept, in different ways, leaving no room for misinterpretation when you read the entire thing. I just finished the new testament, can confirm it’s spread across that entire thing in different ways too. Here are 3 of them:

        Romans 1:26-27 (NIV):

        “Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.”

        1 Corinthians 6:9-10 (NIV):

        “Or do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor men who have sex with men nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.”

        1 Timothy 1:9-10 (NIV):

        “We also know that the law is made not for the righteous but for lawbreakers and rebels, the ungodly and sinful, the unholy and irreligious, for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers, for the sexually immoral, for those practicing homosexuality, for slave traders and liars and perjurers—and for whatever else is contrary to the sound doctrine.”

  • BlanketsWithSmallpox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Reminds me of the fight porn video on reddit recently where a sp./port. Andrew Tate elbowed someone out because another guy fell asleep on his shoulder ring the subway and he had to have a closet gay fit of felonies.

    • systemglitch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Look. Once upon a time a rainbow was a rainbow and everyone loved them. Then a group of people turned it into a symbol of a political movement and now a rainbow is no longer just a rainbow.

      Of course some people are displeased.

      • InternetUser2012@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Those are the people that just do what told to do. They’re told how to feel and think and they gobble it up. They’re easy to see, usually wearing a red dunce cap and have some flags of a washed up felon in the back of their black ram 1500.

      • samus12345@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        The “symbol” being LGBTQ people asserting their right to exist. Without those “displeased” people, the symbol would have never been necessary.