Ordered a set of rechargeable AA batteries and charger. They’re well reviewed and a decent brand. Specifically wanted the charger since it has USB input rather than 120v so I could top the batteries off from my laptop / power bank as they’ll be used for my wireless KB/mouse. The product description only said “USB input” and didn’t specify what flavor. Being 2025, you expect USB-C.

Received them today, and they use micro USB input. Now I have to keep yet another cable in my bag. Day mildly ruined.

  • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Yep.

    Re-engineering is expensive, and so is the licensing of USB-C (along with the port cost, and revamping the manufacturing process, and sourcing, etc).

    The device would no longer be inexpensive, and it has no need of USB-C capability.

    There’s lots more involved than just the port connector itself.

    • walden@wetshav.ing
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      If it’s just for charging, a USB-C port is just a different part. The charge controller and everything can stay “dumb” if it’s a low power device.

      The USB-C spec is complicated and to take full advantage of it is expensive like you said, but I think just using a modern form factor isn’t expensive.