So for context, I went to first grade in mainland China before immigrating to the United States, in China, they teach kids this weird trick that’s basically like reciting a “poem” thing, which I didn’t remember what it was called until I recently googled it. Its apparantly called the “九九乘法口诀表” or 9x9 Song / “The Nine-nine song” (Wikipedia article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_multiplication_table#The_Nine-nine_song_text_in_Chinese).

So like… in 2nd grade, for which I was in the US, multiplication was very easy for me, well… at least up to 10x10. Like idk how to explain it to someone who’s doesn’t speak a variant of Chinese, and even the rhythm only works for me in Mandarin somehow, when I try to use Cantonese, which is the language I speak at home in the US, I cannot replicate the rhythm to make thay thing work, this “Poem”/“Song” is only available to me in Mandarin, like when I think about multiplying together any 2 single digit number, I instictively use the “九九乘法口诀表”.

Like its goes from 1x1 then next lines are 1x2, 2x2, then next are 1x3, 2x3, 3x3, then its 1x4, 2x4, 3x4, 4x4, etc… you get the idea, mutiples of 1, then 2, then 3. So if I need to multiply something by 7, I can start from the line where multiples of 7 are. Sometimes I can remember the exact phrase of it like for example 3x7, without starting from 1x7, then 2x7, then 3x7.

Like I never thought too hard about it, it kinda just became the “normal” way I do multiplication. But someone asked a question on Lemmy about reading analog clocks and I probably didn’t answer their question correctly but that was when I kinda was like: oh wow I forgot that my way of multiplication is probably different from everyone else in the west.

Like if you told me to teach a English-Only speaker on how to do multiplication tables, I… um… I don’t know how I would teach that, the “九九乘法口诀表” doesn’t have the rhythm in English so I doubt converting the it to English would work.

Like even though I speak English as my primary language now, and I barely have any fluency in Mandarin or even Cantonese which I speak at home (and never learned any vocabulary beyond the basics), the “九九乘法口诀表” multiplication thing is always done in mandarin somehow, like its always been stuck in my brain even after all these years in the US.

TLDR answer to my own question. I do it using “九九乘法口诀表” which takes me 1-2 seconds to recall a specific line, so basically, anything up to 10x10 takes about 2 seconds for my brsin to process, 11x11x to 12x12 takes about 5-10 seconds, anything bigger and I just giveup using my brain and pull out a calculator. I memorized 10x10 since first grade, then 12x12 probably by like 2nd grade or maybe first half of 3rd grade.

How do y’all do it, is it easy or hard?

Edit: Okay so the best way for me to explain “九九乘法口诀表” is that: Think of PEMDAS (order of operations), but its for the entire multiplication up to 9x9.

  • BeBopALouie@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    One of the very few teachers I remember (I’m 68) was Fred Ross due to how effectively he taught me the times tables and more. That guy for months on end drilled the times tables into our heads by repetition. There were no calculators or internet then so it was the most effective way and it worked too.

    He also posed a question that to this day I have not found the answer. An English only word with the letter q in it but no u after the q. Can only be a regular word not a name or a city.

  • sleepmode@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Parents got me this plastic grid with buttons containing the problem and when you pushed them, the translucent plastic would show the answer. I memorized them pretty quickly. Not sure if it was the right way to learn but it stuck with me.

  • Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Learned them about age 6, up to 12x12. Still know them, and takes a lot less than 1-2 seconds to call them to mind.

    Except 7x6 and 8x6 which, for some reason, I’ve never been able to learn so I always end up going from 6x6 = 36.

  • silly goose meekah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    we just went to 10x10, and I think we did that in like 2nd grade. so like 8yo. we just had to straight up memorize it, no helpful song or anything. We did it in sections though, so one day we were supposed to memorize 1x1 to 1x10, another day 2x1 to 2x10 etc.

    I can remember 11x11 because it is annoyingly 121 not 111, and 12x12 is 144 which I find kinda easy to remember because of gaming monitors using 144hz (I don’t get why my brain makes those kinda associations, it just works for me idk). 11x12 is weird because it is the first multiplication where my brain starts picking it apart like 11x12 = (10x12) + (1x12) = 120 + 12 = 132

    • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I also remember 144 being particularly pleasing. Also because it was the biggest number on the table.

  • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Rural US in the 1980s and we learnt it starting at I think like 8-9 years old. At the time 9x9 was all we learnt and we were just expected to memorize our “times tables”. I don’t recall any song or anything.

    • innermachine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I was born in 97, also expected to just “memorize” the tables. I never did, and despite my teacher in 3rd grade insisting we would never have a calculator on us at all times, I do in fact have a calculator (phone) in my pockets at all time to do menial math for me.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    As long as you work with decimal numbers, there is no need to actually go beyond 10x10. Heck, even 9x9 would suffice, as times ten is just adding the zero. Anything else is derived from that.

        • megane-kun@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Analog clocks.

          If the hour hand is pointing just past 1, and the minutes hand is very near 8, what time is the clock showing?

          answer

          It’s 1:40

          Now, ofc, it’s becoming somewhat of a lost art, with the increasing prevalence of digital clock displays, so, yeah. Personally, I just developed an intuition for it, having grown up in a time when digital clock displays are rare, and analog clocks are commonplace.


          EDIT/PS:

          Actually, even in that case, reading off the minutes hand off an analog clock doesn’t involve the times table for 12, so your original claim holds.

          • Treczoks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            And now explain to me why you need your multiplication tables go to 12x12 instead of 10x10 just to multiply 8x5.

            • megane-kun@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              Sorry, I added it in the edit.

              Actually, even in that case, reading off the minutes hand off an analog clock doesn’t involve the times table for 12, so your original claim holds.

            • megane-kun@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              Reading off the minutes from where the minute hand is pointed. If the minute hand is pointed at 8, you’d have to multiply 8 by 5 to get 40.

              • smiletolerantly@awful.systems
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                And if it’s pointed to 37, a prime number? Do you have to have your tables memorized up to 37x37 to be able to read that?

                It’s knowing how to count, at best. But out of curiosity, do you really go “long pointer at 8, 8x5=40” internally when reading the clock?

                I’d imagine most people would just go “40”.

                Case in point: in school, we learned how to read a clock before we learned anything at all about multiplication.

                • megane-kun@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I haven’t seen a “37” in an analog clock.

                  There’s a 7, there’s 8, and there are four spaces (which may or may not be marked) in between them.

                  Now, to the main topic:

                  But out of curiosity, do you really go “long pointer at 8, 8x5=40” internally when reading the clock?

                  No. But that’s because due to experience and exposure to analog clocks all my life—which, again, is not something that should be assumed nowadays. When I was taught how to read analog clocks (preschool or very early in primary school, IIRC—so, yes, before I was taught multiplication), I was told to “count by fives”. Hence: 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55 and 00.

                  Now, when we were taught the multiplication table for 5 (maybe it’s just my teacher) we revisited how to read off minutes from the clock (digital displays are still rare back then).

  • ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I could never understand how people be stupid enough to need to memorize the multiplication as a table or some other shiet.

    I always calculated the result - i remembered some of the combinations naturally from repetition.

    The whole idea of multiplication table is stupid af.

    7 x 8? It’s 7 x 10 - 2 x7. 12 x 11? It’s 12 x 10 + 12 you dumb fucks.

    /rant mode off

    • Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I could never understand how people be stupid enough to need to do multiplication or some other shiet.

      I always calculated the result - i remembered some of the combinations naturally from repetition.

      The whole idea of multiplication is stupid af.

      7 x 8? It’s 7+7+7+7+7+7+7+7. 12 x 11? It’s 12+12+12+12+12+12+12+12+12+12+12 you dumb fucks.

      /rant mode deactivated

      • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Leave them alone, they are from .ml they can’t help it that they act smug and superior. The less attention they get the better.

  • Forester@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    American I think by 4th grade we had to know up to 12 x12

    For me I memorized all the self multiples then would subtract or add mentally

    Ie 5 X 7 =? Well 5X5= 25 And 5X2=10

    so 5X7 =35

    So half route memorization half transative properties of multiplication

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      really? how long ago was that?

      20 years ago in Ontario I remember doing multiplication table competitions in grade 6 classes, so I assume we didn’t need to fully know them before then

  • megane-kun@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I was only taught up to 10×10 in primary school, and learned mostly by rote (and also, “skip counting”). I’ve also heard of some techniques like matching fingers to do one-digit multiplication, but I never really learned how to do that. By that point, I’ve mostly memorized the multiplication table up to 10.

    For 11, it’s absurdly easy once I got the technique, just double the number (up until 9). 11×10 is just appending a zero, and 11×11 I just memorized.

    For 12, I actually didn’t bother that much? 12×N = 10×N + 2×N. Thus, 12×11 = 110 + 24 = 134 and 12×12 = 120 + 24 = 144 (which I got memorized for some reason).

    I still have some trouble with the 6, 7, and sometimes 8 multiplication tables, but I can usually recall it with a bit of effort. Not much, but not without some awkward pause.

    Now, for how I got to memorize it. The process was hard at first. I had to recite the multiplication tables as a drill almost everyday. We also had long quizzes (hundred items) of one-digit multiplication and two-digit division (by the fourth grade), so there’s an incentive to memorize the tables if only to be able to get through those quizzes with minimal pain. There’s also a social stigma for being the last person to get done with those quizzes (or worse, running out of time), so there’s that pressure too.

  • dil@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I just memorized it to be the fastest and get candy, I was a fat kid, and memorizing the single digits is necessary to do math in your head? I never understood how to use my hands and i cant hold a visual that well, like 3 apples become 5 become 1 become a truck in the span of a second

  • NorthWestWind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I did it in Cantonese, probably similar to the Mandarin poem.

    I think my mom started making me memorize it in the last year of kindergarten (I was 5yo). By the time multiplication becomes the main topic in primary 2 (2nd grade) maths, I didn’t really have much problem doing them. It was really useful to have it recited.

  • /home/pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I believe in 2nd grade I memorized tables from 1-12. Practice makes you quicker with things and as I don’t multiply random numbers often it will take me a couple seconds to recall the answer