• dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I listen to Better Offline and I’m as jaded and cynical as the rest of us, but even I find some of his episodes to much to take.

      Like he has no impartiality at all, particularly his takes on LLMs. Our small company of software developers and engineers have saved so much time with Visual Studio CoPilot. The fact is there are uses where they’re extremely useful; just maybe not as the MSM portrays it.

      • Thwompthwomp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        He does get a bit ranty. I still appreciate his take though. Some of the LLMs are super helpful for me for some tasks, but the hype cycle for AI is really a lot to take and it does warrant some actual pushback against it. I can tell I’m becoming more of an old man, but it’s nice to have someone else confirm how bad the Internet is becoming. It’s almost like a hazy dream for me of back in the early days when it was just people sharing weird stuff with each other and not the active battle to fend off ads and scummy sites to find things.

        • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          This is an assumption but he’s just preaching to the choir at this point. I don’t see him having a mainstream audience and the only people that listen are people that already know how fucked everything is.

          Also, so many ads. Like sure he’s got to make a living but he’s doing it in the very system he opposes.

  • ccunning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Huh - so it turns out people liked how smartphones consolidated all their various devices into one?

    I guess the era of the hardware app is over…

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      You can’t conclude that from this. The fact that there was hype and excitement about this supports an interest in the concept. This was simply utterly horrible execution and that is all.

        • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I just disagree and/or read different sources. There was considerable hype regarding this device across numerous tech sources and many people liked and still do like the idea. Clearly you don’t think everyone hated it do you? Using words like everyone or no one almost always means your sample is off or your are projecting an opinion.

          • dustyData@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yeah, I don’t doubt there were people who were really hyped out of their minds for this. But it’s my impression they were a minority. Almost all press around the device was extremely skeptical, and only a few were cautiously excited. I follow a lot of tech circles in social media and there wasn’t really a buzz about the pin. But, I think the proof is in the pudding. 10,000 sales is not exactly evidence of an extremely popular device. Even if the end result was bad, if there was a lot of hype, one would expect higher sales. After all we knew the price and conditions of sales (subscription) for a long time before release.

            • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              I don’t think that’s the pudding. The device had a high bar for entry with its price and was a very novel tech device. Most people interested in the concept likely were reticent to pre-order and wanted to wait for early adopter reports to surface. I maintain that there is a viable market and sufficient enthusiasm for the technology / concept that the company promised, but obviously not the one they delivered.

              • dustyData@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                I mean, sure. Several startups are making bank selling AI, not to individuals, but to companies. There is no money to be made long term on mediocre chatbots. No matter in what form factor they come, and unfortunately, this and the rabbit thing poisoned the market and clearly marked anything AI as a scam on buyer’s minds.

                Edit: also, if the hype were really that high for such a device, then the rabbit should’ve sold a lot more units, since it was the budget version of the humane pin. But that wasn’t the case either. And now everyone knows both companies were just pump and dump scams.

                • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Rabbit r1 garnered $10million in pre-order sales. How many should it have sold to impress you? The first 5 batches I think sold out within a day or days, production of the units appeared to be the bottleneck until people actually got a hold of them and reported on how awful they were.

                  You just seem bent on this whole issue. Is there a point you want to make? Or are you just upset about AI stuff in general?

        • Jesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I don’t know about that. That a LOT of people liked that reveal TED talk.

          If this was half the price, could hold a charge, didn’t start fires, and didn’t pull your shirt down, then it would still be dumb, but you’d probably have enough people buying it to keep the company alive.

          • dustyData@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            That was a year ago, with 2 million views and 39k likes. That is not sign of hype. Specially when contrasted directly to the reality of sales.

            Dear lord, you can see on the TED talk when he does the obviously planned big reveal, Imran Chaudhri doesn’t even get an applause. He actually pauses a few times in the conference waiting for the audience to applaud and nothing happens a couple of times. When he makes jokes almost nobody laughs. There’s even a point where he jumps the gun and says thank you before the spontaneous applause™ happens. That has to be the most cringe TED talk in history (and that’s hard because almost all of TED in the past 5 years is cringe), other than the fact it was just an obvious ad.

  • HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    ask for 1B valuation with only ~7M in sales + ~240k/mo subscription revenue… hmmmm gonna be a no for me Dogg

    • nyan@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      So, if we do some sloppy rounding and say that the subscriptions make them 3 million a year . . . it’ll only take a bit more than 330 years for anyone buying Humane at the asking price to break even. My cat could figure out that wasn’t a good buy. (Of course, he’d prefer to invest in a tuna cannery . . .)

    • just_another_person@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Don’t forget about the dangerous batteries and looming recall (due to court action I’m sure)! They’ll soon have ZERO customers, in a way.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The entire company was a pump and dump scheme. They’re gonna continue the pump until dump or bankruptcy.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Every web outlet and influencer with more than 1000 followers bought one. But that’s all they’re ever going to sell.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Isn’t it ironic that most likely, all their sales were used to make videos roasting their shitty product?

  • Kokesh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    No one wants badly executed overheating slow Google assistant in a pointless little box. You already have a superior assistant in your pocket, reacting to your voice.

    • mPony@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’d buy you out but all I have is my 20 bucks from streaming music revenue and I’m going to spend that on beer.

      • Bizzle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        If you even made one dollar off your own music, that’s fuckin cool. You earned that beer!

        What’s your band called?

        • mPony@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          we’re called The Three Leonards. We do covers of pop songs in a pastiche of mid-1980’s Leonard Cohen, and yes it’s pretty different than music other people make today. Folks seem to like our covers of Toxic and Rusted From The Rain quite a bit.

          And yeah, we friggin’ earned that beer.

            • mPony@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              a) Thank you :) That’s super nice to see, first thing in the morning.
              b) Please tell your friends
              c) Which ones do you like best?

        • mPony@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          oh jesus, GOOD beer.
          how anyone can drink sub-par beer is fucking beyond me. Drinking that stuff is just self-disrespect. I mean, I get it, but, just, no.

          • downhomechunk [chicago]@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            I can confidently say as a recovering alcoholic that I would have bought neither. I would gave gone with a handle of the cheapest vodka in the store and a pouch of drum, bugler or Samson. And that would have been my 3 meals for the day.

            • mPony@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              well bud, I must admit that does sound a bit rough. I wish you well in your recovery.

  • bassomitron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    What an insane valuation, lol. I wonder how gullible their seeders/initial investors were when they pitched the company initially. Needing to get that much money to settle bills and debts just blows my mind. Shit like this is why I sold my AMD shares at its peak a few months ago and why it’s probably worth considering selling Nvidia now as it’s peaking. The AI boom may peak a bit higher, but I think the frenzy is going to begin waning within the next ~6 months as more and more investors realize the tech is still very limited outside of backend enterprise use (e.g. using LLMs to ingest all your SOPs, regulations, technical documents, etc. and then make it available for employees to query for random work questions).

    But who knows, I’ve been wrong before.