• Vanth@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    The technical design was done in 2020. It took two years for the design to be approved by the US department responsible for approving such things and it will take until 2029 to get an actual plant approved and built. That’s why I said probably not in the US and only with a lot of political will.

    There’s no climate change solution that won’t take significant political will.

    • KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      But there are solutions that simply require building more small units of something that’s been built in large numbers for the past decade.

      • Vanth@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Are you talking about nuclear or other as these “simply build smaller” solutions?

          • Vanth@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Oh. Well, those also have resource constraints (hazardous and rare materials used in solar panels, batteries for both if that is method of storage), storage constraints (saving energy for when the sun isn’t shining and the wind isn’t blowing), economic constraints (still more expensive than burning coal and oil) and political constraints (people don’t want solar panels or wind turbines in their backyard + political will to stand up against oil and to offer incentives that make solar/wind financially viable).

            Same themes as the challenges to nuclear.