A ephebophile is a older adult who are sexually attracted to 15 and 19.

It really grinds my gears that society doesn’t have a problem with a 18 year old having consensual sex with a 17-year-old. Even though the 18 year old is an adult and the 17 year old is a minor. But if 26 year old has consensual sex with a 18 year old. Ah then society has a problem. But why should that be a problem? When both actions are completely harmless as long as both people are consenting adults.

  • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Straw man

    A straw man fallacy (sometimes written as strawman) is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction.[1] One who engages in this fallacy is said to be “attacking a straw man”.

    • TrenGoblin@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Bro you the one that using strawman agurements. In the OP I clearly say that ephebophilia between two consenting adults is not morally wrong.

      So do you think a 26 year old man being sexually attracted to a 18 or 19 your woman is not a ephebophile?

      • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        In the OP I clearly say that ephebophilia between two consenting adults is not morally wrong.

        this argument is flawed because

        ephebophelia cannot exist between two adults since

        So do you think a 26 year old man being sexually attracted to a 18 or 19 your woman is not a ephebophile?

        first, i don’t believe you’re interested in that, or you wouldn’t be here trying to convince everyone it’s ok to fuck kids. but, also:

        Straw man

        A straw man fallacy (sometimes written as strawman) is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction.[1] One who engages in this fallacy is said to be “attacking a straw man”.

        • TrenGoblin@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Love how you just dodge my question So I will ask you again do you think a 26 year old man who is only sexually attracted to 18 and 19 year old woman is. not a ephebophile By definition?

          • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            for, like, the fifth time…

            first, i don’t believe you’re interested in that, or you wouldn’t be here trying to convince everyone it’s ok to fuck kids. but, also:

            Straw man

            A straw man fallacy (sometimes written as strawman) is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction.[1] One who engages in this fallacy is said to be “attacking a straw man”.