A ephebophile is a older adult who are sexually attracted to 15 and 19.

It really grinds my gears that society doesn’t have a problem with a 18 year old having consensual sex with a 17-year-old. Even though the 18 year old is an adult and the 17 year old is a minor. But if 26 year old has consensual sex with a 18 year old. Ah then society has a problem. But why should that be a problem? When both actions are completely harmless as long as both people are consenting adults.

  • TrenGoblin@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Bro you the one that using strawman agurements. In the OP I clearly say that ephebophilia between two consenting adults is not morally wrong.

    So do you think a 26 year old man being sexually attracted to a 18 or 19 your woman is not a ephebophile?

    • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      In the OP I clearly say that ephebophilia between two consenting adults is not morally wrong.

      this argument is flawed because

      ephebophelia cannot exist between two adults since

      So do you think a 26 year old man being sexually attracted to a 18 or 19 your woman is not a ephebophile?

      first, i don’t believe you’re interested in that, or you wouldn’t be here trying to convince everyone it’s ok to fuck kids. but, also:

      Straw man

      A straw man fallacy (sometimes written as strawman) is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction.[1] One who engages in this fallacy is said to be “attacking a straw man”.

      • TrenGoblin@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Love how you just dodge my question So I will ask you again do you think a 26 year old man who is only sexually attracted to 18 and 19 year old woman is. not a ephebophile By definition?

        • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          for, like, the fifth time…

          first, i don’t believe you’re interested in that, or you wouldn’t be here trying to convince everyone it’s ok to fuck kids. but, also:

          Straw man

          A straw man fallacy (sometimes written as strawman) is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction.[1] One who engages in this fallacy is said to be “attacking a straw man”.