Local Colorado officials have reached an $8.5 million settlement with a woman who was hospitalized in 2022 after being left handcuffed in a police SUV that was then hit by a train.

The city of Fort Lupton and town of Platteville, Colorado, agreed on the settlement with the victim, Yareni Rios-Gonzalez, according to a release from the Fort Lupton Police Department. The settlement amount will be split equally between the town and city and paid by their insurers, according to attorney Eric M. Ziporin, whose office represents the city.

Rios, who was a suspect in a road rage case, survived the September 2022 collision but suffered nine broken ribs, a broken arm and other injuries.

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Police aren’t civilians and they aren’t workers. Abolish their “union” as well as Qualified Immunity. They can earn the right to not be prosecuted while doing their job…

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Oxford Languages definition:

        civilian:

        noun

        a person not in the armed services or the police force.

        I’m obviously using the term in a non-military context as the topic is policing, not military or international conflict.

        • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Where’s Oxford again? American policing is based on the fact that a civilian force polices a civilian body. Its part of the tools to avoid military dictatorship, the same way the President is a civilian chosen by the people to be the Commander in Chief of the military.

          • ripcord@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Marriam-webster:

            1. one not on active duty in the armed services or not on a police or firefighting force
            • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Cool now tell me what common parlance has to do with the legal classification of police officers? (Hint: legally cops are civilians and dictionaries dont supercede the law)

                • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  The argument was always that cops are civilians, no posts have been moved, you just realized you’re wrong and a definition from a non legal document doesn’t mean jack shit when it comes to government classification.

    • Thassodar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      So many people are anti-union but when it comes to the police union they’re oddly silent…

    • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Police are supposed to be civilians. The whole idea of America avoiding mitary dictatorship was vested in the Army being under the control of the Commander in Chief (a civilian chosen by civilians), In conjunction with the police force being comprised of civilians, otherwise that force is just a military with a different name. You can make the argument they’re above civilians in current times but this is by no mean integral to american policing, and is in fact antithetical to the American idea of police.

      Don’t get me wrong I still think they’re problematic even in the theoretical best case scenario, but they’re definitely civilians. Know you enemy, know them well.

      • Wrench@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’m not an expert on the origins of police in the US, but I thought their origin story was basically to oppress the civilian population to protect corporate property.

        Like, their entire purpose and why they were given authority was so that they could beat down civilians in the name of corporate profits. Which is the opposite of what you’re claiming.

        • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          How are those contradictory? Can a civilian force not shakedown people to protect property?

          Or are you asking me why they made a theoretical safety on the idea of policing instead of just telling everyone ‘Hey these are going to be our new chosen opressors, have fun!’

          • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            How are those contradictory? Can a civilian force not shakedown people to protect property?

            I think the idea is that civilian force has governmental protections that other civilians would otherwise never have.