In a lawsuit, Lauren Pisciotta alleges the star sent her lewd texts and performed sex acts while on the phone with her, according to US media.

She claims she was fired in 2022, but that a $3 million (£2.4 million) severance package was never paid.

The BBC has contacted West’s lawyer for a response to her allegations, but has yet to receive a reply.

The lawsuit was first reported in the US by TMZ, and later confirmed by Rolling Stone, The Wrap and US Weekly, which says court papers were filed on Monday in the US.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Yeah, those antisocial loners are never useful for anything. Certainly not stuff like suicide bombing or mass shooting. Those are done by people who are the life of the party.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Certainly not stuff like suicide bombing or mass shooting. Those are done by people who are the life of the party.

      Nazi ideology had a pretty collectivist cult of sacrifice, strength, loyalty etc, so why not.

      Other than that - motives for suicide bombings and mass shootings are usually directed against groups presenting themselves as any Nazis do when they have power.

      And such groups are deeply hostile to individual actions like a suicide bombing. Maybe for a few assassinations or as an excuse for some action - yes, but not as a system.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I think I know more about fascism than you, having been really interested in the subject in the past.

          “Terrorism” as commonly used (suicide attacks etc) is, in fact, asymmetric warfare. And in emotion it’s an individual going against a mass. It’s the opposite of fascism.

          “Terrorism” as Stalin’s repressions, or jailing random people for words, or police not touching violent groups harassing someone, etc - yes, these are normal for fascism.

          I think this has been a long and monotonous exchange, so one question - what are you expecting to gain from this conversation? And another - could we please cut there?

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Sorry, your arrogance doesn’t actually mean you know better.

            Mussolini was known to use terrorism all the time. That’s literally what his blackshirts were known fore before he seized power.

            https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/breaking-police-mussolinis-use-terrorism

            https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2017/01/how-italian-fascists-succeeded-in-taking-over-italy.html

            https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/mussolini-founds-the-fascist-party

            But please do tell me Mussolini, who came up with the term ‘fascism,’ was not a fascist or that his tactics weren’t terrorism. That should be fun.

            As for what I am expecting to gain from this conversation? Just correcting your false and/or silly claims for other people’s benefit since I am assuming you are the sort of person who never admits when they’re wrong, especially based on your silly “I know better than you” comment at the outset.

            • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              You are not arguing what I said and in general seem clueless. As did everyone who has actually called me arrogant in an argument, while I really am.

              I “admit I’m wrong” when I see I’m wrong. “Admitting I’m wrong” because of pressure is a negative trait and I don’t do that.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                You didn’t look at a single link, did you? That’s the only way you couldn’t see that you were wrong. The first link even had ‘terrorism’ in the URL.

                How about rather than insult me (I have flagged you again), you explain to me why either Mussolini didn’t use terrorism or why Mussolini was not a fascist?

                • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Links prove that you ignored what I said about the word “terrorism” being the only thing uniting suicidal bombings and fascist violence, and these two parts being clearly divisible.

                  Can you please go to Facebook with that conflict attitude and your opinion that this tone makes you smarter?

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    This is what you wrote:

                    “Terrorism” as commonly used (suicide attacks etc) is, in fact, asymmetric warfare. And in emotion it’s an individual going against a mass. It’s the opposite of fascism.

                    “Terrorism” as Stalin’s repressions, or jailing random people for words, or police not touching violent groups harassing someone, etc - yes, these are normal for fascism.

                    The links, which you clearly are refusing to read, so I’m not sure why you’re telling me what’s in them, show that asymmetric warfare in the form of terrorism was exactly what brought Mussolini to power.

                    Again, I know that you will never say you were incorrect (I doubt you ever do), this is for the benefit of others.

                    And I have flagged you again for incivility.