• AlphaOmega@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s a common Mandela Effect. Interview with A vampire instead of interview with THE vampire.

          Read the book 6 times plus, saw original movie a few times and wrote a book report on it. For me it’s always been interview with A vampire

          • VelvetStorm@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Omg, wtf is even going on! I’ve read all her books like 3 or 4 times each and saw the movie like 5+ times and never knew that.

          • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s so common Google autocorrect gave me “interview with a vampire” as an option, and not “interview with the vampire” after only typing the string "interview "

  • CYB3R@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    If covers are allowed… I will always love you by Whitney Houston was so good people outside the US forgot/didn’t knew it was a cover.

  • Nikls94@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lord of the Rings. I’ve read the books before watching the movies (I saw them first like 3 years ago) and the books are just… walking… And they walked…. Walked…. They walked… so much walking…. still walking…. And then walking…

    • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is Interesting that in the Chinese version of Fight Club, it’s end with a message saying that after the final scene the narrator was arrested and institutionalized and the movement disbanded, making it more faithful to the original ending of the book.

  • Vanth@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I thought the Three-Body Problem on Netflix was better than the book. I haven’t seen the Chinese TV series adaptation of the book, but I’ve heard it was really good too.

    • TH1NKTHRICE@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Good to know. Wasn’t sure 3BP show would be good because I think the book was so slow. Probably lost in translation.

      • Aqarius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I heard it was the next big scifi trilogy, but when I read it it was like “Really? This?”

  • SolidGrue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    2001: A Space Odyssey (1968), at the time of its release, was based on a short story called The Sentinel by Arthur C Clarke. In that story, the roots of the Tycho Monolith plot segment of 2001 of is sketched out, and then expanded as both a screenplay and a full-length novel.

  • mobius_slip@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Jaws the movie is much better than the book. None of the characters in the book are remotely likeable.

  • Gsus4@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Blade runner. Much better than “Do androids dream of electric sheep?” but it is only loosely based off it.

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re almost too different to compare imo, but both the book and the movie are top-tier.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The truth of the matter is that a lot of PKD and Heinlien era sci-fi was very focused on exploring a single theme - that works well literary but isn’t rich enough for TV/Movie - so those works generally got richer and usually were by transitioned by genuine fans that tried to keep the theme and core message.

      • MicrowavedTea@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I feel this is mostly the case with short stories (and a lot of those works were short stories). Where there isn’t enough material for a full movie, the writers are free to add more to the story without messing much with the original. DADOES did have enough material but the movie decided to go a different direction while keeping the main theme. I wouldn’t say one is better than the other in this case as they’re pretty different.

    • ThisIsNotHim@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      A solid chunk of Philip K Dick’s output worked better as movies/TV than as books.

      There’s definitely something there, but the books feel somewhat unfinished/unpolished. Which makes sense, his books weren’t popular in English until after the release of Blade Runner, which coincided with his death. Maybe the popularity of the movie would’ve given him more time and resources to revise future works.

      A Scanner Darkly is the only one where both the book and the movie felt about the same quality.

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      TBF that was a low bar to clear. They just had to make sure the show was better than a bunch of screaming children.

      However it is truly fantastic