This will probably just make peer to peer messaging apps more popular.
this could finally be a good “reason” to convice some people near me to get into meshtastic
Less likely peer-to-peer, more likely selfhostable.
Just in time for me to finally have completed my Matrix setup a few days ago.
I prefer XMPP, which is lighter, but I have a Matrix server too and get why you’d prefer it.
Like a choice between cake and pizza.
Briar is pretty cool if you’re on Android.
What’s the advantage over signal?
If you have Internet it uses tor and there’s no main server to rely on.
If there’s no Internet it can use Bluetooth and Wi-Fi locally.
Very cool and impressive, but I’d rather be able to share arbitrary files.
And looks like you can only send images in DMs, but not in groups/forums.
Well, ones that aren’t based on a service operating in the EU, at any rate.
I don’t think that most people will care
99 percent of people won’t care, won’t understand, or just be part of the mindset of why be scared if we have nothing to hide.
Only us techs will care
Facts, if I could donate a star or gold I would
I just don’t get it why mainsteam media almost never reports about this.
Because it’s not been free press for a long time.
Remember when journalism was supposed to be outrageous? That’s not a mark of quality, that’s a rule. If it’s not outrageous, then it’s most likely not journalism.
It also never reports on wars outside of the agreed upon narrative. There’s time and narrative for everything. That doesn’t happen with free press. There may not be open censorship and coercion, but not seeing something is different from knowing it doesn’t exist.
users of apps with a communication function would have to agree via terms and conditions or pop-up messages that all images and videos sent to others will be scanned automatically and possibly reported to the EU and the police.
This is more like coercion than consent.
And let’s be clear: The goal of legislation like this is not to allow investigating child abusers, which can already be done legally. The goal is to impose mass surveillance on the population, circumventing due process.
What if I don’t agree? No messages?
On the next EULA click no or don’t agree and try using the service
It works with cookie popups, except you need to deny them with every page load
Those are a little different.
Most likely.
If consent mattered, governments and corporations all around the world wouldn’t be pushing to expand the global surveillance apparatus.
Is this just another Tuesday now? Fuck me.
They always hide behind the claim it’s for the children… but how many children have they actually saved from this?
They’re probably gonna put parents behind bars for a misunderstanding on their private lives
This reminds me of that time google was scanning photos and reported a man to the police for being a pedophile, turns out it was a father sending a picture to his doctor
That’s our tax dollars at work.
They always hide behind the claim it’s for the children
Sometimes it’s the terrorists.
It’s so that children wouldn’t get recruited by terrorists.
Extrapolating a bit, children here may symbolize the civilian casualties of that world order becoming a bit more open, and terrorists those of us who don’t agree.
See, I can do this without alcohol.
But… Are they then going to catch or protect all the terrorist children?
Catholic clergy is sill grifting around this here country…
As if any chat systems inteded for dubious purposes in the darknet would give a flying f-ck about this law.
Even if you don’t opt in, 99% of the people you interact with would have opted in. So you will monitored as they please.
I’d vote for testing this mass chat control on politicians and CEOs of the companies that want this mass control. Let’s say for the next 10 years? Or 20? Pretty sure the results will be great. For people, for justice, for democracy.
That won’t happen. What will happen is that functionality will be there, on paper requiring your consent, but you’ll never know how many times they’ve used it without consent.
They will read your correspondence, find threats to their power, make sure by soft nudges that those never materialize.
People saying that USSR was democratic will get to live in one, only without even the ideology of “freeing the humanity, building communism and colonizing space”.
