• disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    The problem is that it was never inflation.

    The food industry ran into supply chain constraints that legitimately increased prices at a rate higher than inflation. Greed set in and they turned those high prices into margin once they stabilized the supply chains.

    • OpenStars@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      But isn’t that just explaining the reason behind the inflation? Prices went up, at that time merely called a “spike”, due to supply chain constraints. Followed by not merely statically keeping those prices but increasing them further still, aka greedflation. But together they fulfill the standard definition:

      In economics, inflation is a general increase in the prices of goods and services in an economy.

      So I would not agree with the word “never”, and therefore am not sure what you are trying to say.

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        That’s true. It’s still inflation by definition. Typically when people refer to economic inflation, it’s the expected increase in the cost of goods and services year over year. The standard inflation rate in the US is typically between two and three percent. Referring to this as inflation can imply to some that it’s tied to the standard increase. I’ll edit to include the word standard for clarity.

    • Aphelion@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      That is the most accurate and succinct explanation I think I’ve seen anyone offer.