• Ballistic_86@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I think it is interesting to point out that AI will be good, maybe too good. It isn’t right now, it’s a novelty in the early stages of such mass adoption that a lot of the consequences are just starting to appear.

    The phones owned by Gen A in 40 years will have a useful, realistic, and default AI assistant. It just sucks that the development of this technology is only driven by late-stage capitalism.

  • Juice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I am a software developer, this story isn’t really about that though. When I was first becoming interested in coding I was reading about vr and ar and how it would be this huge multi billion dollar market in the next few years and I thought that sounded awesome, as it could enhance our lived experiences with info for the curious, or decorate the real world with computer generated architecture, sculpture, even some ads to pay for the whole thing. I said I’m gonna get into computer programming and then transition into vr/ar once I learn a few things.

    Of course this didn’t pan out. 2-3 huge tech companies rushed onto the market with somewhat crappy products just to own the patents so smaller companies couldn’t innovate. When they weren’t immediately profitable they started cutting back and shutting down. Just another big tech grift, like cryptocurrency and now AI. Ai is probably the worst example of all because it got pushed out to soak up a bunch of excess cloud computing when crypto crashed, and now its a huge real estate scheme as well since there’s a big rush to build data centers to handle the artificial demand. You wanna know the next big bubble to bet against? Its ai and all the related industries.

    It requires massive amounts of computing power to accomplish the most mundane tasks, which require electricity created by burning fossil fuels. All so your boss can spend less time writing emails letting you know you’ve been laid off, and political advisors can mass produce legislation to take away your rights.

    • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Of course this didn’t pan out. 2-3 huge tech companies rushed onto the market with somewhat crappy products just to own the patents so smaller companies couldn’t innovate. When they weren’t immediately profitable they started cutting back and shutting down.

      The way advanced capitalism can’t even grow a product before trying to strangle it for every last penny is all that saves us from special Black Mirror levels of hell.

  • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    It told me today that Harvard did research to show 165 degrees killed H1N1 in milk. The reference? Recommended cooking temp for chicken.

    • EnderMB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Some companies have you sign things after leaving.

      Obviously, when you start laying people off, or do stupid shit like stack ranking, some people are going to walk out and just blab about all the dumb shit your employer does/did - and they’re heroes for doing so.

      • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        What are they gonna do if you refuse to sign? Fire you?

        If this guy voluntarily left, then he wasn’t getting a severance package that they could withhold (and on that note, this is a good reason to include involuntary severence in your employment contract, if you can negotiate it).

        • EnderMB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          For many, it’s the severance offered that makes them sign. If you’re about to lose your job, a few months pay, and free relocation back home if your visa is due to be cancelled is likely enough to make you sign something.

          I’m not condoning it, at all. I think the practice is fucking disgusting, and have seen it wreck lives, but it’s a reality in many tech companies, including Google under Sundar.

          • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            But they’re not gonna offer severence to someone who quits, right?

            The wording made it sound like he quit rather than got laid off.

            • EnderMB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              My understanding is that while you’re 100% being terminated (and are ineligible for rehire) what you sign indicates that you’re actually volunteering to resign.

              For more info on it, look up Amazon’s Focus and Pivot programs.

              • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                Laws will differ in different places, but I’m familiar with 3 categories of terminations:

                1. With cause (firing)
                2. Without cause (layoff)
                3. Voluntary (quitting)

                When someone is terminated with cause or quits, they are not entitled to severance and they do not collect unemployment insurance. When someone is laid off, the employer is obligated to pay a severence package.

                The Amazon focus and pivot program is interesting. That definitely looks like they’re bribing low performers to quit, and I smell an ulterior motive. Maybe it’s to get them to sign an NDA but I feel like it’s to avoid wrongful dismissed lawsuits. Although I suppose why not both?

        • EnderMB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I think that Amazon and Meta (where this is a known practice) do both. I’ve not signed anything in tech that stops me talking about internal company practices or any work that might have resulted in “voluntary” dismissal, but others in these companies that do the Jack Walsh thing and fire their employees do…

    • mkwt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      These are all general opinion statements. There aren’t any verifiable facts like, “on this date at a meeting with x we discussed how AI project y is myopic and non-user-centered.”

  • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    For a brief moment in the beta for all this, it basically just summarized the top two or three reputable results, and attached a link to where it got the data.

    They should have just left it at that, and not started mixing in random blogs and social media sites.
    The ability to summarize the Wikipedia article and a random university professors page where they list every fact known to man about pine trees or something was actually helpful.

    If I want the AIs best guess about how to fuck up a pizza, I just go to the site where I can ask it. Bad advice when searching is just shit.
    A tldr for “what is turpentine” is actually helpful.

  • perishthethought@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    How do you get the AI results on google.com? When I search for anything, it shows a summary and then all the results, sponsors, etc… Nothing is tagged as “AI”.

    (I never visit google so forgive me if this has an obvious answer)

      • Zerush@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yes, the sense of humor is still somewhat limited in AIs. Anyway, Andi is not designed to tell jokes, but rather to give reliable answers to questions and this it does quite well…

  • Venat0r@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    The difference between G+ and now is that Google search is actually bad now and they need to do something to fix it, but they just did the completely wrong thing…

      • DudeImMacGyver@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Invite only, then when they didn’t have enough users, they tried to force it on everyone in conjunction with trying to force them to use their real names on YouTube. The whole thing was just an absolute master class in fucking up a launch from start to finish.

  • Scary le Poo@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    The difference is that Google+ was actually a wonderful product.

    But a couple years down the line Google did what Google does and destroyed it from the inside making it worse and worse until it was just a shell of what it started out being.

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Google did what Google does

      I remember wrapping my head around “Google Wave” and being like “Hey that sounds nea–oh it’s gone already?”

    • bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      It was a fine product I don’t know about wonderful. The communities could be good that was true. But the actual UX was pretty middle of the road IMO.

      • Scary le Poo@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        If you were into tech, the tech people were amazing. Yonatan Zunger comes to mind. He was a backend engineer at Google and the guy was great.

        I also met many people who are still friends, many of whom became real life friends too.

        I even got an amazing job thanks to my contacts on g+.

        The feed layout was awesome. The fact that everything got fed to rss. The fact that you could tailor posts so easily. God I miss it. Only social media I’ve ever really been a part of.

        It was wonderful ♥️

        • Laser@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Also basically every Linux big name posted there. It was so great. I’m still sad it’s gone

        • bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Hey like I said the communities were great! But no worries I’m glad it was a great experience for you and I don’t want to be needlessly contrarian here

        • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          A wonderful product or a wonderful community? It sounds like you’re describing the people who were on it and not the platform itself.

          • Scary le Poo@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            The platform was wonderful. Intuitive, powerful, everything every other platform was not. Google started killing it slowly long before it died, but in its heyday it was amazing.

  • maculata@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Trailer Trash be all like: “SEE AH TOLD Y’ALL IT WAS GOOD FOR THE BABY! GOOGLE DONE SAYS SO!!!”