All he needs is the Supreme Court to agree. My guess is that they won’t, but they are out of their fucking minds, so we really have no idea, it’s a giant coin flip. The majority of those judges are horribly corrupt and basically terrible human beings, but if they destroy the country badly enough, they know it will come back to burn them. The question is how much risk they’re willing to take.
To render someone stateless is a HR violation (UDHR article 15), but there are plenty of countries that do not grand citizenship simply because a person is born within their borders (eg most of Europe).
Isn’t birthright citizenship a human right or UN right or something?
The world is pretty divided in giving citizenship based on the person’s parents or on place of birth: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jus_sanguinis
And you think trump cares?
I don’t. But it might be extremely difficult to approve.
All he needs is the Supreme Court to agree. My guess is that they won’t, but they are out of their fucking minds, so we really have no idea, it’s a giant coin flip. The majority of those judges are horribly corrupt and basically terrible human beings, but if they destroy the country badly enough, they know it will come back to burn them. The question is how much risk they’re willing to take.
No.
To render someone stateless is a HR violation (UDHR article 15), but there are plenty of countries that do not grand citizenship simply because a person is born within their borders (eg most of Europe).
But birthright citizenship is Good, imo.
It is pretty much the peak human rights, to not let a human become a refugee at birth.
-:vibe replying:-