“It” being the PyPI server not finding it? Pip not supporting the API? Or it downloads correctly but the setup.py prints that error?

What do you mean “not supported by the platforms”? And do you mean that or “removed”?

Exactly this. Services and software are not the same thing, you’re asking for a service recommendation and it can’t be open-source software because it’s not software.

what if pip didn’t support 0.112.4 anymore?

What do you mean by that? If new versions of Python didn’t run that version of fastapi? If PyPI removed it?

I have never met anyone refer to “screen off” as “sleep”.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sleep_mode

The terms everybody else are using are: “sleep” = “suspend to RAM” = “S3” and “hibernation” = “suspend to disk”.

If you’re one of those people that think every product is better if there’s “AI” on the box then sure. What you’re describing is static analysis though, it is not new.

Ok so what do you call “sleep”? You’ve now listed suspending, sleeping, and hibernating as 3 different things.

Probably not. Obfuscation works, and might even depend on remote code being downloaded at either build time or run time.

There are a lot of heuristics you can use (e.g. disallowing some functions/modules) to check a codebase, but those already exist no AI required. Unless you call static analysis “AI”, who knows.

Suspending to disk usually requires a password on resume.

I have a lot of trouble with the window/pane management. Moving panes to a different window is rather difficult. The server>session>window>pane hierarchy also seems way too deep for my humble needs.

The fact that the active window syncs between sessions is also really odd. Why can’t I look at different windows on different devices?

Nextcloud, Syncthing, PeerTube, Vaultwarden, Gitea (+drone, drone-qemu, gitea-pages), Wireguard, FreshRSS

I feel you, but on the other hand if every single community member tries to help, even if they have no idea or don’t understand the question, this is not great.

Anybody can ask Google or an LLM, I am spending more time reading and acknowledging this bot answer than it took you to copy/paste. This is the inverse of helping.

The problem is not “the loop”(?), your (LLM’s) approach is not relevant, and I’ve explained why.

What was “the point”? From my perspective, I had to correct a fifth post about using a schedule, even though I had already mentioned it in my post as a bad option. And instead of correcting someone, turns out I was replying to a bot answer. That kind of sucks, ngl.

Did it write that playbook? Did you read it?

What? I said I’m already using unattended-upgrades.

Sure, bugfix and security.

I’m sorry but I got a lot of very dumb answers like “have a staging environment” and “use a schedule”, even though I listed both this points in my (very short) post already. The most detailed answer I got is a playbook copy/pasted from an LLM, and this one dude was getting into all subthreads to tell me I don’t understand what I’m asking until I blocked him. So you don’t have to worry about me, this was probably my first and last thread on Lemmy ;-) Either way, apologies if I got heated up.

Thanks, that sounds like the ideal setup. This solves my problem and I need an APT mirror anyway.

I am probably going to end up with a cronjob similar to yours. Hopefully I can figure out a smart way to share the pool to avoid download 3 copies from upstream.

What do you mean?

This doesn’t seem to enhance my workflow at all. Seems I now would have to reboot, and I still need to find a separate tool to coordinate/stagger updates, like I do now. Or did I miss something?

Using scheduling is not a good option IMO, it’s both too slow (some machines will wait a week to upgrade) and too fast (significant part of machines will upgrade right away).

It seems that making APT mirrors at the cadence I want is the best solution, but thanks for the answer.