The way you word it suggests that donations to Mozilla are expressly forbidden from being spent on Firefox. Which I doubt is true.

But yes, many would prefer to donate specifically for Firefox development than into a general pool for Mozilla to allocate as they choose.

My brain skipped as I read Brennan and tabletop in the same sentence and jumped to Dropout/Dimension 20.

Even the phrase “improving the situation in Gaza” can be ambiguous.

Marginal at best when everything is made elsewhere and requires fossil fuels for transport.

Get an S/MIME certificate and send from an S/MIME compatible email client.

I think the alternative: copyright should be looser. It usually only benefits corporations and lawyers.

Though it would be naive to consider AI companies and ally in a goal to reduce copyright terms.

New Zealand -> Kiwi.

Human languages: the words are made up and the rules don’t matter.

Especially true for English.

If it wasn’t for StarOffice/OpenOffice/LibreOffice Impress, is have thought a rename to Impress would be a good name.

I read this a few weeks ago about it.

https://www.wheresyoured.at/the-men-who-killed-google/

All: 🫠

At least we don’t use the Roman method of varied hour lengths depending in the time of day and times of year.

In what way?

Presumably to disable that hot linking from other websites/apps. Especially if they use scrapers.

But yeah, bad ux.

bootstrapping problem.

I imagine that theoretical speed could only be used for drone planes.

I don’t have an example, but I would like to see a rotary phone dial ui as input method for a phone number.

Edit: I see there’s mentions and a gif in another comment.

They can’t fix the bug because it’ll affect the outcome of any experiments.

Always been a fan of it being Hal Finney, regardless of any evidence. It’s poetic symmetry with losing both around the same time.

Local companies may have similar names to others that exist overseas.

To require them to be in a globally common non-regionalised pool of domain names is more likely to increase scam risks.

Should the various regional companies of the Vodafone brand be forced to have all their world wide customers sign in to a global parent organisation Vodafone.com? Is it not better for the regionally specific customer portal be vodafone.com.au and vodafone.co.uk?