Reddit for reference

I mean, if you argue that way during the interview I’d pass… Nobody thinks you’re asked to do all that in a one-day interview.

Exactly what I feel about HTML after using QML.

Although there are already comments with good libs, you could also look into services like Weebly.

Also, they often don’t read more than a few lines. I applied as a dev for a company which I had many friends inside. They all knew my skills. The problem was the high-level managers because they didn’t read the memo (and didn’t even read my CV), assumed I can’t do engineering because I was an academic at the time.

an engineering manager said during an interview, “OK, we’re going to build a To Do List app right now,” a process that might normally take weeks.

Tbf you can do that in one day with ChatGPT, although it requires some generic software engineering skills. But that’s the point.

Even if you don’t complete the task, the process of coding can prove your skill level in a positive way.

Tbf it was always a nightmare to manage driver conflicts on Windows 95.

Checks kbin and kbin app status. Sad, but the burnout part is true at least.

The sad reality with decent judges. They don’t force their ideals like the corrupt ones do.

There’s the horror of scientific software written by researchers I’ll share here. They are fired The contract expires every 2 years and users keep using the code if it’s successful. Some projects are closed source, even…

I feel like Google results these days value the domain rather than the individual webpages instead. Always the same websites…

I can imagine. Vast majority of applications I receive as a manager has nothing to do with the job. Those are often just copypasta used for dozens of letters.

I am a highly skilled…

Just read the first 5 words and throw it away.

Reading this article, these tools look into characteristics like hobbies, while apparently ignoring logic in a written text. Sure, the outcome’s gonna be horrible.

Also, you’re gonna miss unique talents because all it does is to learn typical good candidates. No way you’ll find Jobs!

It’s a result of systematic job training and matching. 10s of thousands of people with similar backgrounds (college / university degrees, formalized through central controls, for example), applying through a few websites.

There’s of course gonna be mass application.

This: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_comparison

I’m so happy I never applied for this kind of mass job hunting. I just didn’t like it. I couldn’t believe it was the right thing to do. Turned out, I don’t regret turning down BS.

The pattern is, the latter are targets of Russian operations, and so far it seems to be successful at generating kompromats.

Sure, diff tools aren’t meant for this. At least you could try dedicated backup tools like borg.

Another thing: schedule the backup to happen while you sleep or have lunch.

The consequence of falling behind is gravely different from most heinous acts. It can impact the military, elections, espionage, or whatever.

As I always write, trying to restrict AI training on the ground of copyright will only backfire. The sad truth is that malicious parties (dictatorships) will get more training materials because they won’t abide by rules. The end result is, dictators would outperform democracies in terms of future generation AIs, if we treat AI training like human reading.

I understand. I’ve been like you every now and then.

AFAIK after Getting Things Done appeared in the beginning of the email era, nobody found a definitive alternative for 20 years. And the GTD way of doing time constraints is “put it in the calendar”.

While each person has their own way of doing things, I’d be surprised if there were a revolutionary alternative to this.