Official gov ID photo.
Official gov ID photo.
You’re literally claiming things that are not true. Voicing your opinion against a prospective (as in it hasn’t even happened) action by the Speaker of the House is a right afforded to everyone, including representatives. Speaking against something is not perversely somehow suppressing speech. Saying someone is not allowed to speak against something is suppressing of speech.
You have not explained your reasoning at all on how saying they’re against Netanyahu speaking in front of the House is subversion of free speech and not just those representatives exercising their own freedom of speech. That is exactly what freedom of speech is, the right for everyone in the US to voice their opinions.
In contrast, there is no right to speak in front of the House, especially not for a foreign politician. The Speaker can invite someone to speak, and if anyone physically interferes with the invitee’s speaking or shouts over them, that would be a violation of House procedures, not any infringement on their freedom of speech. They would not have been silenced or punished. They would not have been gagged (physically or otherwise). They would still be able voice their opinions.
Actual examples of speech suppression would be searching and questioning pro-Palestinian journalists at the border, and arrests of peaceful non trespassing protestors.
It’s this famous Hong Kong movie scene: https://youtu.be/szPqlLQxSGY?t=1m31s
The audio in the animation is the Mandarin dub, the YouTube video is of the Cantonese original.
This is the worst misuse of this meme format I’ve ever seen. It would’ve been so easy to do the right format too:
Is my legal case so incredibly weak?
No, it’s my lawyers who are incompetent.
Yeah if that’s all that needed replacing. The entire system is ancient, not just the disks, like: