Kavita, same as Komga requires too much RAM.
Komga can track ebook reading progress, by converting them to images.
Kavita, same as Komga requires too much RAM.
Komga can track ebook reading progress, by converting them to images.
It doesn’t support OPDS-PSE, which is the most common way of tracking progress.
It actually has a ui. But it looks minimal enough. I’ll try it.
Gollum. Hit integration is required if you value wiki content.
ConnectBot is fine.
Why do we invent new DEs instead of making proper settings app in already existing ones?
Fight for Americans’ fit bodies! Stop illegal oil production!
Some seem to use Debian.
Linux Libre makes Guix unusable on most hardware. It also requires much effort to configure. Learn scheme, how to use shepherD, etc.
It’s really cool, when automation tools create more problems than they actually solve.
Ncmcpp, MPV with scripts
Not really. Void, alpine, gentoo are the only usable ones(besides non-systemd forks of arch and Debian). These are the only ones maintaining enough packages, providing enough documentation, not being just poorly maintained forks of X distro.
I deleted it. No need for two almost identical posts to exist.
Really? Didn’t known. Lemmy.today seems to not work properly on mobile apps.
It’s a matter of probability. Probability of discovering vulnerabilities in multiple tools doing same thing is higher than in just one.
in there.
Whonix Dev quote:
Use a distribution with an init system other than systemd. systemd contains a lot of unnecessary attack surface… ©Linux Hardening Guide
Because they don’t execute million lines super thoroughly checked shell code or why exactly? Without any explanation total FUD.
Because they are not merged with journaling system, job scheduler and watchdog. More features→more attack surface.
What an average Mint user gains from systemd? A bit slower boot time? A bit more ram used? 50mb heavier system updates? What problems systemd solves? I use systemd, runit and openrc on different machines and I don’t face any significant problems.
If you will create “next gen” desktop, you will just solve some problems of already existing ones and create your own. Maturity of software is far more important, than uniqueness. GNOME didn’t evolve into its current state for no reason.