Yeah, apart from transportation it is really the easiest way to have a personal impact on carbon dioxide emissions. If you rent, you can’t exchange your heating system, if you use electricity you have no impact on where it comes from and so on.
Moving the goalpost much? First it is not the consumers fault, then it is too expensive and now you do not even have time to cook?
It was the historical reason for this rule, yes. In the time people eating pig meat were getting sick, so they put a rule into their religion as a countermeasure.
What about vegetables? If you are talking about plant proteins with not a lot of carbs go for TVP or vegan protein powders.
You mean being in need of green energy as soon as possible? I don’t see nuclear helping short term.
While renewables get build without subsidies, because they pay off anyway.
Yeah, that’s what I also never got. If you have dirt in the kitchen, that’s semifluid, no one in their right mind would clean it without wetting it. But for the butt that does not count. I do not have a bidet, but I can reach the faucet from my toilet. So I just wet the toilet paper and produce far less toilet paper waste thanks to this.
I mean, it doesn’t have to relate to a particle. Lambda is also associated with a property of space itself.
The point with the LHC is, that it is very hard to find something, that you are not actively looking for. You have to at least have a certain understanding of the decay channels of the proposed particle to be able to scan the data for it. It’s the same problem they have for discovering dark matter particles.
Oh with mainstream science I meant the journalism, probably bad wording.
Yeah, but somehow mainstream science gaslit everyone into thinking, that the current model is definitely right, even though there are relevant observations, that are not explained by it. But I guess we just need a new even bigger particle accelerator and then we will definitely find dark matter particles!
It is not very reliable to use a component to build a model that has “no support from observations”.
But it has support from observations? It’s an alternative explanation for the red shifts we observe from far away sources.
ΛCDM has also problems. For example that two different methods of calculating the Hubble constant do not agree, or that the James Webb telescope found galaxies, that are too old. The latter was the motivation for the paper and gives an explanation for it, contrary to current models.
Yeah, it is not generally a good idea to just throw in more components, like here a scalar.
Well, guess what the Λ in ΛCDM is? They just put it in there to be able to fit the theory to the observation. And it’s absurd to say, that they would’ve found that in the LHC, when they also did not find dark matter particles, even though they are actively looking for those.
Does it still explain galaxy rotations? What about other cosmological data, like equation of state parameter and such?
They are aware of this and mention it already in the abstract:
It remains to be seen if the new model is consistent with the CMB power spectrum, the Big Bang nucleosynthesis of light elements, and other critical observations.
It’s quite common for research groups to do this, because their work is quite complex and takes time. They proved that their approach might have some merit and now other groups can help them going forward with it.
That’s a different thread though. Alejandra might not have been aware of it, like I was.
Where?
Some person: Nazis burned books on transgenders
Rowling: That’s a lie.
Alejandra: Here sources proving, that nazis did indeed burn books, including a German court ruling that explicitly stated, that nazis moved against transgenders too and the denial of that is Holocaust denial.
Rowling: But they were not the first victims and they didn’t burn all books.
Like, her whole argument is completely off. She is the only one, that ever mentioned “all books” and “first victims”.
https://twitter.com/jk_rowling/status/1767912990366388735
I don’t have a Twitter account anymore, so I can’t look for the whole thread. The “not the first” tweet is an answer to someone replying to this tweet here.
Edit: found it:
No, she moved the goalpost to “they were not the first”, her original statement was completely different.
There are still people, that want to have kids at some point.
I think there are some studies around, where people eating breakfast have an easier time to control their weight. They let them eat the same calories on a day and the breakfast group didn’t take on weight. I think that might be because the breakfast group had higher energy levels and therefore also expended more energy by movement before lunch.
Yeah, but farmers have a powerful lobby and they produce our food. So they got some power behind their words.
More parties unfortunately does not fix the problem, as you can see by the rise of fascists in nearly all democracies worldwide.