Can we stop repeating clickbait titles from cancer tech magazines? If you post, then why not just give us the gist of the article? For instance here: what’s the feature, and why is it a concern that one might „fall in love“ with it?
Can we stop repeating clickbait titles from cancer tech magazines? If you post, then why not just give us the gist of the article? For instance here: what’s the feature, and why is it a concern that one might „fall in love“ with it?
It’s called sponsorblock, and there is no machine learning involved whatsoever. The data is crowdsourced.
Anyone else read that as „morphine spray-on gel…“?
Archive link against the pay/subscription wall
I have no collection whatsoever. Everything that I watched gets deleted from the seedbox. A maximum of 900GB are stored on there at any given time. It’s cheap and no hassle to maintain.
Of course they are cheaper, thats why they put them everywhere instead of regular buttons.
Yes it is. But your comment still doesn’t make sense until you add “per year”.
WattHours is a unit of work. If you say that bitcoin uses x amount of Wh it doesn’t say shit about how much it actually consumes. Because you don’t say in what amount of time Bitcoin uses said amount of work, you cannot compare it. I could state, that Bitcoin uses 5 Wh. Which would also be correct.
Its the same as saying, Bob eats 5 apples. Alice eats 2000 apples. Can you compare the two? No, because what I forgot to mention is, that Bon eats 5 apples a week and Alice eats 2000 apples in 3 years. Now i can compare the two.
Do you get my point?
The comment was 172TWh without specifying a timeframe whatsoever. Is it a year? Is it a day? A month?
It was about the comment about bitcoin, not the post itself.
172 TWh per year
Your statement was as useful as the following: A VW Polo car costumes 3000 liters of fuel.
I think with Edge you get punched, robbed and then raped for good measure.
Do you think there are no assholes working for google or mozilla? Assholes are everywhere. And fuck cancel culture.
That’s partly because the pot itself heats up. With conventional stoves you have to heat the pot first, which takes a lot of time.
That’s nice, but this project seems very dead, or am I missing something?
I don’t think brains are capable of thinking something about something. Brains are used to think something about something. I don’t know, sounds stupid to me too. I think of it like a plane. There’s a computer or a person flying the plane, the plane doesn’t fly itself. Probably would have sounded less stupid, if it said something like „What happens really in our brains, if we think about/hear these mimicry attempts?“
Oh wow I didn’t know. Fuck Ashton Kutcher!
I don’t see what was wrong with the comment of /u/voyajer. Can you elaborate?
Why is it important that you vote in that poll that is clearly just designed to get you to sign up for the newsletter? Just don’t do it, nothing good could come of it.
Never tested 2FAS, but tofu I have been using for years. Can’t complain, it works.
Try this, if your TV can run it: https://smarttubeapp.github.io/ No ads, and there is even sponsor block included, so you don’t have to hear the annoying „segue to our sponsor“ and „please like and subscribe“ nonsense.