That can be fixed by enabling desktop mode. Not a very good fix but that’s just the Firefox reality.

Removed by mod

I think it’s a good decision. Those who aren’t happy just want a way to do ban evasion for calling everyone fascist.

Well that in itself isn’t discrimination I think. Discrimination is region restricting the game because of it. That’s what I meant.

It still is discrimination by the definition of the word.

"illegal software

Afaik in English the word “illegal” doesn’t only mean “against the law”. It also means “against the rules” and cheating is indeed against PUBG’s terms.

Also you didn’t mention how they talked about cheating in different regions which kinda sounded like national discrimination.

Hmm sounds worse than some commercial solutions.

Yea that is kind of not ok.

Hmm I decided not to interact with the answers a lot as they are personal opinions but yours is very radical so I decided to step in. Please keep in mind that not all people have an ability to buy any kind of expensive setup. Ray tracing is great but it indeed has a severe performance impact and not all manufacturers have efficient hardware for it yet so an ethical and nondiscriminatory way of implementing forced ray tracing will not be possible any time soon. Just something to keep in mind when forming a strong opinion.

React Native really is the worst lol.

If only they weren’t the single reason of the I-l confusion on the internet.

I like the compass

Impossible. Everyone has money problems (or income optimization problems) and with FOSS it’s even more obvious.

I like to consider opinionated forums and social media different things so I wouldn’t agree with this one.

Not sure why you’re beeing downvoted.

Fediverse people.

and allow fediverse users to comment on it as well.

Well that surely is beneficial if you want a lot of heated engagement and rather questionable thoughts in your comment section lol.

Why?

If I had evidence then I would show it. Unfortunately at that time I was pretty positive about the society so I didn’t save any evidence or took it any seriously. I know it makes my accusations much less valid but it is what it is. I understand your skepticism because of that. Asking for proof is always a good thing.

Well with all due respect, all aggressive leftists say so. I have a different opinion that I am going to stick to.

It’s also more complex to implement for large groups, unless you mean only dm’s.

This statement clearly shows that you’re not familiar with Revolt very much. They only “wanted” to implement encryption for direct messages as it’s practically impossible for a large group chat to verify each other’s keys. However Revolt’s team is still acting strange and I will be bold to assume many of them have mental issues (as I have talked to them in the past). I do not trust that project and I consider their official disrespect of certain protected characteristics (such as nationality and religion) a massive red flag.

Then how about E2EE? They don’t really rush to implement that either. And I think the reason is political (aka enforcing their left wing ToS).