Why not move back to the country you emigrated from? Assuming you still hold valid citizenship there? I would love the help trying to turn this shit around, but its too dangerous for you here.

In the field. We already addressed that. Humans pick the food in 104° weather in late June/July/August when the wet bulb globe temperature is 95+

Wheat berries?

See the funny thing about the English language is that they’re almost certainly implying that he looks like a specific person that they’re pretending exists. But to me it reads like they’re using a general description of all the subjects that they’ve already detained.

I think it’s moreso that people misunderstand what you’re implying. That making them “martyrs” is a good thing to help identify more pieces of shit that rally behind their martyrdom.

Yeah, let’s just keep taking the moral high road. Eventually shitty people will just stop existing. There’s no reason to actively work on removing them. 🥴

Shit will keep flowing into a sewage treatment plant if you don’t treat the sewage. In the end you just end up with a mountain of shit to deal with and the problem is much more difficult to manage.

Can people tell me why we keep using the stupid fucking “border czar” term? I want to know who the fuck these people are and what their actual titles are. It makes reading headlines such a fucking chore. I end up having to google the context of a headline like every 4th article.

For those curious, Tom Homan’s actual title is White House Executive Associate Director of Enforcement and Removal Operations

What really pisses me off is that their anti-cheat forces me to use dogeOS

Chernobyl was disastrous because design flaws were not relayed to the plant engineers. It took years of roadblocked research to find out what had happened. Even the man that had helped to design the RBMK reactor did not consider a meltdown was possible because the xenon that ended up poisoning the reactor would burn off under normal circumstances.

The meltdown could have been prevented if not for the soviet government inexplicably withholding critical information about the reactor from it’s own engineers.

I’m annoyed about this whole story, the guy claims to never have sailed before and is crossing the Pacific ocean in like a 25 foot boat. The ocean isn’t forgiving. A single storm would be more than capable of capsizing his vessel in the open ocean. What he’s doing is reckless, dangerous, and inconsiderate of his close friends and family.

It really doesn’t matter when the number is that large and its the ethics of accepting such a valuable gift anyway. My main concern other than ethics is that it’s going to cost taxpayers a significant amount more to retrofit the plane with defense systems, communications, and redundancies than to just build it that way from scratch. Plus they’ll need to verify security of electrical components and systems as well. All of that will be done on our dime since it will be the Air Force performing all of that.

At the very least you can mute the tab

It’s pretty difficult to kill/do harm to a sitting US president. There’s an entire agency tasked with nothing but ensuring that their life is never physically threatened. In addition there’s probably only about 500,000 people that are physically close enough at any one time. Most people just want to live out their life to the best of their ability. Take care of their kids, spend time with family, enjoy personal activities. Successfully harming the president comes with either a death sentence or life imprisonment. No matter the circumstance. It would set an extraordinarily dangerous precedent if the assailant managed to avoid consequences.

Unrelated, it’s crazy to me that Xerox has remained in the lexicon for so long.

Because blood is red regardless of oxidation.

I literally just argued the opposite with my FiL. I think property should be illegal to inherit. If you have multiple children, you usually end up with a disagreement on what to do with it and how to split it up. It allows the consolidation of property for wealthy families.

You’re just factually wrong. Now you may have an argument that someone that’s driving drunk may be a better driver than someone that’s a bad driver while sober, but alcohol impairment reduces inhibitions, increases reaction time, impairs motor control, and alters judgement. That objectively makes you a more dangerous driver compared to your sober self.

I think I understand now. Thank you! I will be changing my paths then. It’s kind of a moot point since I’ll change my paths anyway, but for the sake of my own curiosity, i have a follow up question. Feel free to disregard it if you don’t feel like taking the time to answer.

Hypothetically, my docker setup only allows jellyfin to see /mnt/user as /storage. So jellyfin would report the path to Morbius as being:

/storage/hdd1/media/movies/Morbius_all_morbed_up.mkv

when in all actuality it would be:

/mnt/user/hdd1/media/movies/Morbius_all_morbed_up.mkv

My intuition tells me that the file path that jellyfin “sees” would be the security risk. So “/storage/hdd1/…” Is that correct?

Can someone ELI5 this for me? I have a jellyfin docker stack set up through dockstarter and managed through portainer. I also own a domain that uses cloudflare to access my Jellyfin server. Since everything is set up through docker, the containers volumes are globally set to only have access to my media storage. Assuming that my setup is insecure, wouldn’t that just mean that “hackers” would only be able to stream free media from my server?

It was Snowball! He snuck into our group chat under the cover of night and sabotaged our great windmill war plans!