Yeah, no. This comment alone would go against any government NDA - and this user is just some random person who, going by their comment history, most certainly has no inside knowledge of anything.
Yeah, no. This comment alone would go against any government NDA - and this user is just some random person who, going by their comment history, most certainly has no inside knowledge of anything.
I sometimes wonder what needs to happen to people in order for them to confidently write nonsense like this.
I sometimes wonder what needs to happen to people in order for them to confidently write nonsense like this.
It seems like the entire industry is in pure panic about AI, not just Google. Everyone hopes that LLMs will end years of homeopathic growth through iteration of long-existing technology, which is why it attracts tons of venture capital.
Google, which sits where IBM was decades ago, is too big, too corporate and too slow now, so they needed years to react to this fad. When they finally did, all they were able to come up with was a rushed equivalent of existing LLMs that suffers from all of the same problems.
I agree. The only application that is fine for this in my opinion is using it solely for entertainment, as a toy.
The problem is of course that everyone and their mothers are pouring billions into what clearly should only be used as a toy, expecting it to perform miracles it currently can not and might never be able to pull off.
Its not chatgpt that’s just default config u can use the API endpoint to point to any chatgpt api compatible llm.
Since the issue with hallucinations is shared by all LLMs, not just ChatGPT, this doesn’t change anything.
Are you seriously trying to push your ChatGPT “tool” in response to an article about language models like this one having substantial issues? “Not guaranteed” - yes, obviously, that’s the point of the article - and from a quick look at your code, I don’t see how this nonsense addresses any of that.
One of the most convincing tricks he pulled off was transporting two people from the stage to what looked like a believable beach. Totally fooled me (but I was a kid when I watched it).
The “well-regulated militia” part afterwards isn’t vague, but gets ignored by self-proclaimed “originalists”.
They go after this platform, because it’s a favorite of mass shooters. You know this.
The AR-15 is designed for hunting humans, not game.
Would you describe someone who has likely driven a Jeep as smart?
At least in China’s case, the harassment extends to ethnically Chinese people who have lived their entire lives abroad and never set foot in China.
This appears to be the new norm among autocratic regimes (although it isn’t all that new - think of Trotsky, for example).
Vietnam is doing this as well:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tr%E1%BB%8Bnh_Xu%C3%A2n_Thanh
https://rsf.org/en/dissident-exile-stops-blogging-because-family-vietnam-being-hounded
Eritrea, a regime that is similarly repressive as North Korea, but far less known, is also notorious for this:
Saudi Arabia is among the worst in this regard:
It wouldn’t be a Republican ban if it wasn’t tackling a fictional “issue”.
Apples and (lab-grown) oranges.
You would think that millions of global COVID deaths that he (and Xi - but nobody is allowed to vote that idiot out of office) is primarily responsible for would finally keep people from voting for the “it can’t get any worse” guy.
COVID-19 killed almost three times as many Americans as died during WW2 due to both inaction and deliberate malicious actions. This alone should have resulted in a prison sentence for Trump and his inner circle.
Imagine the Papal States never dissolving and becoming a nuclear-armed power in the 20th century, using the threat of nuclear annihilation to maintain their independence and increase their global influence.
That would be an interesting alternative history scenario.
The above comment is an example of this getting waved away.