• ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    i don’t think their intention is to keep them empty. not the worst thing to spend co2 on.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Their intention was to bolster the economy with busy work, but that’s not a long term solution.

      • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        busywork making houses ahead of time is pretty good tbh.

        id take that over ai or some shit.

        • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          That’s comparing Apples to Shampoo. To completely different concepts and it’s not an either/or situation.

          • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            it really isn’t. both give out emissions, one of them is housing.

            its like complaining wind farms are ugly.

            • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              Concrete doesn’t house CO2. When they created Biodome2, the engineers didn’t factor in the curing time and CO2 output and the scientists had to vent the facility or suffocate.

        • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Houses don’t stand long on their own. It takes a significant amount of time and money to keep these things from filling up with mold or collapsing.