The Sapienza computer scientists say Wi-Fi signals offer superior surveillance potential compared to cameras because they’re not affected by light conditions, can penetrate walls and other obstacles, and they’re more privacy-preserving than visual images.

[…] The Rome-based researchers who proposed WhoFi claim their technique makes accurate matches on the public NTU-Fi dataset up to 95.5 percent of the time when the deep neural network uses the transformer encoding architecture.

    • IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      If it doesn’t get used for bad purposes it is very cool yes. So no it’s not cool at all. It’s fucked.

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        People willingly provide enough tracking of themselves already

        While this could have military applications, the need to generate a profile of the person you want to track makes this less of a concern for your average “carries a phone everywhere” person