So it has to be a death sentence before anything should be done about it?
Yes, other groups and communities might have similar suicide rates and life is hard for them too, but this isn’t about them? So what is their relevance in this argument exactly? They should be helped too not seemingly pitted against the LGBTQ community like this is a them or us thing.
Agree, those other issues are legitimate as well, and access to those should be improved. But that can be accomplished along with allowing better access to gender affirming medication.
So it has to be a death sentence before anything should be done about it?
Yes, other groups and communities might have similar suicide rates and life is hard for them too, but this isn’t about them? So what is their relevance in this argument exactly? They should be helped too not seemingly pitted against the LGBTQ community like this is a them or us thing.
Agree, those other issues are legitimate as well, and access to those should be improved. But that can be accomplished along with allowing better access to gender affirming medication.
Open access on the Internet to anyone at random does not equal productive or helpful societal care is my point.
It’s a drug lord selling their stock.
But because it confirms a group that wants easier access it becomes an argument about morals in a way that it shouldn’t be is exactly my point.